Direxion Daily NVDA Bull 2X Shares (NASDAQ: NVDU)

에 대한 최신 뉴스 Direxion Daily NVDA Bull 2X Shares (NASDAQ:NVDU)

Direxion Daily NVDA Bull 2X Shares

Technology

Direxion

The fund, under normal circumstances, invests at least 80% of its net assets (plus any borrowings for investment purposes) in the securities of NVDA and financial instruments, such as swap agreements and options, that provide leveraged exposure to NVDA. The fund is non-diversified.

Direxion Daily NVDA Bull 1.5X Shares

High,End,Graphics,Card,Computer,Hardware,Upgrade,On,A,Desk.

Analyst Color

Asia

Large Cap

Specialty ETFs

Movers

Tech

ETFs

NVDA

NVDL

NVDU

엔비디아(NASDAQ:NVDA)가 월요일에 200일 이동평균선을 하회하면서 주요 기술적 지지선을 돌파하며 하회했다. 이는 딥시크(DeepSeek)라는 중국의 오픈소스 인공지능(AI) 플랫폼 출시 후 발생한 엄청난 매도세로 인해 엔비디아의 프리미엄 칩에 대한 수요에 대한 투자자 우려가 촉발된 후 발생한 일이다.

엔비디아, 2년 만에 처음으로 200일 이동평균선 하회, 딥시크가 기술적 리셋을 촉발

Nvidia Corporation (NVDA)

Equities

News

Markets

Analyst Ratings

엔비디아(NASDAQ:NVDA)의 주식이 금요일 0.8% 상승하여 138달러로 마감하며 시가총액이 3조 달러를 넘었다. 그러나 낙관적인 전문가들에 따르면 주가는 더 상승할 수 있다.

엔비디아의 주식은 지난 1년간 233% 이상 급등, 강세론자들은 더 높아질 수 있다고 주장

General Motors Co (NYSE:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/GM#NYSE">GM</a>) has announced the end of vehicle exports from the U.S. to China, a decision communicated to employees and dealers of its China export business. 
This move comes amid ongoing U.S.-China trade discussions, particularly concerning tariffs and broader economic conditions, according<a href="https://www.reuters.com/business/autos-transportation/gm-stop-exporting-vehicles-us-china-company-says-2025-05-19/?utm_source=chatgpt.com"> to</a> Reuters.
GM&#8217;s exports to China were facilitated through its Durant Guild premium import division, which accounted for less than 0.1% of its total sales in the Chinese market. The company cited significant changes in economic conditions as the reason for restructuring the Durant Guild and optimizing GM China&#8217;s operations. This follows a similar decision by GM&#8217;s competitor, Ford Motor Co (NYSE:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/F#NYSE">F</a>), which halted its exports to China in April, <a href="https://www.reuters.com/business/autos-transportation/gm-stop-exporting-vehicles-us-china-company-says-2025-05-19/?utm_source=chatgpt.com">said</a> Reuters.
The broader context of these decisions includes significant financial challenges for GM in China. In December 2024, GM recorded a $5 billion charge against its Chinese operations due to increasing competition and market challenges. This included a write-down of up to $2.9 billion in its Chinese joint venture and $2.7 billion in restructuring charges. The restructuring efforts involve plant closures and portfolio optimization to counter market challenges, <a href="https://www.thetimes.com/business-money/companies/article/general-motors-takes-5bn-charge-against-operation-in-china-zf8g9d9j8?utm_source=chatgpt.com&amp;region=global">according</a> to The Times.
As part of its restructuring, GM is closing its plant in Shenyang, China, which produced Buick GL8 minivans and Chevrolet Tracker SUVs. This decision is in response to intense competition from local manufacturers and is part of a broader strategy to focus on premium vehicles under the Cadillac and Buick brands, along with its premium import business, <a href="https://www.reuters.com/business/autos-transportation/gm-closing-plant-china-part-restructuring-2025-02-14/?utm_source=chatgpt.com">said</a> Reuters.
These strategic shifts by GM and Ford highlight the challenges faced by U.S. automakers in the Chinese market, including high tariffs and increasing competition from local manufacturers, particularly in the electric vehicle sector. Both companies are adapting their operations to navigate these challenges and optimize their global strategies.
Read Next: <a href="https://www.benzinga.com/analyst-ratings/analyst-color/25/05/45505333/investors-piled-into-long-term-treasury-etfs-ahead-of-moodys-downgrade-will-confidence-hold"> • Investors Piled Into Long-Term Treasury ETFs Ahead Of Moody&#8217;s Downgrade: Will Confidence Hold?</a>
Photo: Shutterstock

Global

GM Announces The End Of Car Exports To China

Spotify Technology (NYSE:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/SPOT#NYSE">SPOT</a>) has outperformed the market over the past 5 years by 13.41% on an annualized basis producing an average annual return of 28.44%. Currently, Spotify Technology has a market capitalization of $136.26 billion. 
Buying $1000 In SPOT: If an investor had bought $1000 of SPOT stock 5 years ago, it would be worth $3,448.27 today based on a price of $664.50 for SPOT at the time of writing.
<h3>Spotify Technology's Performance Over Last 5 Years</h3>
<img src="https://www.benzinga.com/files/images/story/2025/1747692919_0.png" alt="comp_fig" />
Finally -- what's the point of all this? The key insight to take from this article is to note how much of a difference compounded returns can make in your cash growth over a period of time.
This article was generated by Benzinga's automated content engine and reviewed by an editor.

Trading Ideas

SPOT

$1000 Invested In Spotify Technology 5 Years Ago Would Be Worth This Much Today

American Res (NASDAQ:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/AREC#NASDAQ">AREC</a>) reported quarterly losses of $(0.24) per share which missed the analyst consensus estimate of $(0.12) by 100 percent. This is a 60 percent decrease over losses of $(0.15) per share from the same period last year. The company reported quarterly sales of $49.68 thousand which missed the analyst consensus estimate of $1.30 million by 96.18 percent. This is a 25.19 percent decrease over sales of $66.40 thousand the same period last year.

Earnings

Earnings Misses

AREC

American Res Q4 EPS $(0.24) Misses $(0.12) Estimate, Sales $49.68K Miss $1.30M Estimate

<a href="https://asia.nikkei.com/Business/Finance/Mizuho-and-Mercer-to-team-up-to-offer-asset-management-services">https://asia.nikkei.com/Business/Finance/Mizuho-and-Mercer-to-team-up-to-offer-asset-management-services</a>

General

'Mizuho and Mercer to team up to offer asset management services'- Nikkei Asia

Qifu Technology (NASDAQ:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/QFIN#NASDAQ">QFIN</a>) .

Guidance

QFIN

Qifu Technology forecasts Q2 2025 net income of RMB1.65B -1.75B and non-GAAP net income of RMB1.75B-1.85B.

Qifu Technology (NASDAQ:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/QFIN#NASDAQ">QFIN</a>) reported quarterly earnings of $1.86 per share which beat the analyst consensus estimate of $1.72 by 8.14 percent. This is a 77.14 percent increase over earnings of $1.05 per share from the same period last year. The company reported quarterly sales of $646.40 million which beat the analyst consensus estimate of $615.60 million by 5.00 percent. This is a 12.38 percent increase over sales of $575.21 million the same period last year.

Earnings Beats

Qifu Technology Q1 Adj. EPS $1.86 Beats $1.72 Estimate, Sales $646.40M Beat $615.60M Estimate

Trip.com Group (NASDAQ:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/TCOM#NASDAQ">TCOM</a>) reported quarterly earnings of $0.82 per share which missed the analyst consensus estimate of $0.86 by 4.65 percent. This is a 1.2 percent decrease over earnings of $0.83 per share from the same period last year. The company reported quarterly sales of $1.91 billion which met the analyst consensus estimate. This is a 15.69 percent increase over sales of $1.65 billion the same period last year.

TCOM

Trip.com Group Q1 Adj. EPS $0.82 Misses $0.86 Estimate, Sales $1.91B Inline

11 analysts have shared their evaluations of WR Berkley (NYSE:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/WRB#NYSE">WRB</a>) during the recent three months, expressing a mix of bullish and bearish perspectives.
The following table encapsulates their recent ratings, offering a glimpse into the evolving sentiments over the past 30 days and comparing them to the preceding months.
<table>
<thead>
<tr>
<th></th>
<th align="right">Bullish</th>
<th align="right">Somewhat Bullish</th>
<th align="right">Indifferent</th>
<th align="right">Somewhat Bearish</th>
<th align="right">Bearish</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>Total Ratings</td>
<td align="right">2</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
<td align="right">8</td>
<td align="right">1</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Last 30D</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
<td align="right">2</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>1M Ago</td>
<td align="right">1</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
<td align="right">2</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>2M Ago</td>
<td align="right">1</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
<td align="right">4</td>
<td align="right">1</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>3M Ago</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
Insights from analysts' 12-month price targets are revealed, presenting an average target of $70.55, a high estimate of $80.00, and a low estimate of $62.00. Observing a 8.39% increase, the current average has risen from the previous average price target of $65.09. 
<img src="https://www.benzinga.com/files/images/story/2025/1747692089_0.png" alt="price target chart" />
<h2>Analyzing Analyst Ratings: A Detailed Breakdown</h2>
The analysis of recent analyst actions sheds light on the perception of WR Berkley by financial experts. The following summary presents key analysts, their recent evaluations, and adjustments to ratings and price targets.
<table>
<thead>
<tr>
<th>Analyst</th>
<th>Analyst Firm</th>
<th>Action Taken</th>
<th>Rating</th>
<th>Current Price Target</th>
<th>Prior Price Target</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>Meyer Shields</td>
<td>Keefe, Bruyette &amp; Woods</td>
<td>Raises</td>
<td>Market Perform</td>
<td>$75.00</td>
<td>$65.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Bob Huang</td>
<td>Morgan Stanley</td>
<td>Raises</td>
<td>Equal-Weight</td>
<td>$75.00</td>
<td>$63.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Brian Meredith</td>
<td>UBS</td>
<td>Raises</td>
<td>Buy</td>
<td>$78.00</td>
<td>$73.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Meyer Shields</td>
<td>Keefe, Bruyette &amp; Woods</td>
<td>Raises</td>
<td>Market Perform</td>
<td>$65.00</td>
<td>$62.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Elyse Greenspan</td>
<td>Wells Fargo</td>
<td>Raises</td>
<td>Equal-Weight</td>
<td>$70.00</td>
<td>$69.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Alex Scott</td>
<td>Barclays</td>
<td>Raises</td>
<td>Underweight</td>
<td>$62.00</td>
<td>$52.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Yaron Kinar</td>
<td>Jefferies</td>
<td>Raises</td>
<td>Hold</td>
<td>$66.00</td>
<td>$57.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Meyer Shields</td>
<td>Keefe, Bruyette &amp; Woods</td>
<td>Lowers</td>
<td>Market Perform</td>
<td>$62.00</td>
<td>$64.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Elyse Greenspan</td>
<td>Wells Fargo</td>
<td>Lowers</td>
<td>Equal-Weight</td>
<td>$69.00</td>
<td>$70.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Mark Hughes</td>
<td>Truist Securities</td>
<td>Raises</td>
<td>Buy</td>
<td>$80.00</td>
<td>$68.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Joshua Shanker</td>
<td>B of A Securities</td>
<td>Raises</td>
<td>Neutral</td>
<td>$74.00</td>
<td>$73.00</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<h3>Key Insights:</h3>
<ul>
<li>Action Taken: Analysts adapt their recommendations to changing market conditions and company performance. Whether they 'Maintain', 'Raise' or 'Lower' their stance, it reflects their response to recent developments related to WR Berkley. This information provides a snapshot of how analysts perceive the current state of the company.</li>
<li>Rating: Gaining insights, analysts provide qualitative assessments, ranging from 'Outperform' to 'Underperform'. These ratings reflect expectations for the relative performance of WR Berkley compared to the broader market.</li>
<li>Price Targets: Analysts gauge the dynamics of price targets, providing estimates for the future value of WR Berkley's stock. This comparison reveals trends in analysts' expectations over time.</li>
</ul>
Understanding these analyst evaluations alongside key financial indicators can offer valuable insights into WR Berkley's market standing. Stay informed and make well-considered decisions with our Ratings Table.
<a href="https://www.benzinga.com/quote/WRB/analyst-ratings?adType=benzinga-insights&amp;ad=analyst-ratings&amp;campaign=wallstreetadvantage">Stay up to date on WR Berkley analyst ratings.</a>
<h2>Unveiling the Story Behind WR Berkley</h2>
W.R. Berkley is an insurance holding company with a host of subsidiaries that primarily underwrite commercial casualty insurance. The firm specializes in niche products that include various excess and surplus lines, workers' compensation insurance, self-insurance consulting, reinsurance, and regional commercial lines for small and midsize businesses.
<h3>WR Berkley's Economic Impact: An Analysis</h3>
Market Capitalization Analysis: The company's market capitalization is above the industry average, indicating that it is relatively larger in size compared to peers. This may suggest a higher level of investor confidence and market recognition.
Revenue Growth: Over the 3M period, WR Berkley showcased positive performance, achieving a revenue growth rate of 7.89% as of 31 March, 2025. This reflects a substantial increase in the company's top-line earnings. As compared to competitors, the company surpassed expectations with a growth rate higher than the average among peers in the Financials sector.
Net Margin: WR Berkley's net margin excels beyond industry benchmarks, reaching 11.84%. This signifies efficient cost management and strong financial health.
Return on Equity (ROE): WR Berkley's financial strength is reflected in its exceptional ROE, which exceeds industry averages. With a remarkable ROE of 4.82%, the company showcases efficient use of equity capital and strong financial health.
Return on Assets (ROA): WR Berkley's ROA stands out, surpassing industry averages. With an impressive ROA of 1.02%, the company demonstrates effective utilization of assets and strong financial performance.
Debt Management: WR Berkley's debt-to-equity ratio is notably higher than the industry average. With a ratio of 0.32, the company relies more heavily on borrowed funds, indicating a higher level of financial risk.
<h2>What Are Analyst Ratings?</h2>
Ratings come from analysts, or specialists within banking and financial systems that report for specific stocks or defined sectors (typically once per quarter for each stock). Analysts usually derive their information from company conference calls and meetings, financial statements, and conversations with important insiders to reach their decisions.
Some analysts publish their predictions for metrics such as growth estimates, earnings, and revenue to provide additional guidance with their ratings. When using analyst ratings, it is important to keep in mind that stock and sector analysts are also human and are only offering their opinions to investors.
Breaking: Wall Street's Next Big Mover
Benzinga's #1 analyst just identified a stock poised for explosive growth. This under-the-radar company could surge 200%+ as major market shifts unfold. <a href="https://www.benzinga.com/premium/ideas/turning-point-trader-checkout-2/?t=Tu1tu3arja3be22tu36&amp;adType=benzinga-insights&amp;ad=analyst-ratings&amp;campaign=wallstreetadvantag">Click here for urgent details</a>.
This article was generated by Benzinga's automated content engine and reviewed by an editor.

Expert Outlook: WR Berkley Through The Eyes Of 11 Analysts

In the last three months, 11 analysts have published ratings on Travelers Companies (NYSE:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/TRV#NYSE">TRV</a>), offering a diverse range of perspectives from bullish to bearish.
In the table below, you'll find a summary of their recent ratings, revealing the shifting sentiments over the past 30 days and comparing them to the previous months.
<table>
<thead>
<tr>
<th></th>
<th align="right">Bullish</th>
<th align="right">Somewhat Bullish</th>
<th align="right">Indifferent</th>
<th align="right">Somewhat Bearish</th>
<th align="right">Bearish</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>Total Ratings</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
<td align="right">5</td>
<td align="right">5</td>
<td align="right">1</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Last 30D</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
<td align="right">1</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>1M Ago</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>2M Ago</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
<td align="right">4</td>
<td align="right">4</td>
<td align="right">1</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>3M Ago</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
<td align="right">1</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
In the assessment of 12-month price targets, analysts unveil insights for Travelers Companies, presenting an average target of $273.64, a high estimate of $296.00, and a low estimate of $247.00. Witnessing a positive shift, the current average has risen by 3.01% from the previous average price target of $265.64.
<img src="https://www.benzinga.com/files/images/story/2025/1747692078_0.png" alt="price target chart" />
<h2>Breaking Down Analyst Ratings: A Detailed Examination</h2>
An in-depth analysis of recent analyst actions unveils how financial experts perceive Travelers Companies. The following summary outlines key analysts, their recent evaluations, and adjustments to ratings and price targets.
<table>
<thead>
<tr>
<th>Analyst</th>
<th>Analyst Firm</th>
<th>Action Taken</th>
<th>Rating</th>
<th>Current Price Target</th>
<th>Prior Price Target</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>Michael Phillips</td>
<td>Morgan Stanley</td>
<td>Raises</td>
<td>Equal-Weight</td>
<td>$269.00</td>
<td>$245.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Elyse Greenspan</td>
<td>Wells Fargo</td>
<td>Raises</td>
<td>Equal-Weight</td>
<td>$260.00</td>
<td>$247.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>David Motemaden</td>
<td>Evercore ISI Group</td>
<td>Raises</td>
<td>Outperform</td>
<td>$296.00</td>
<td>$288.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Meyer Shields</td>
<td>Keefe, Bruyette &amp; Woods</td>
<td>Raises</td>
<td>Outperform</td>
<td>$290.00</td>
<td>$274.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Alex Scott</td>
<td>Barclays</td>
<td>Lowers</td>
<td>Overweight</td>
<td>$280.00</td>
<td>$287.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Yaron Kinar</td>
<td>Jefferies</td>
<td>Raises</td>
<td>Hold</td>
<td>$270.00</td>
<td>$265.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Brian Meredith</td>
<td>UBS</td>
<td>Lowers</td>
<td>Neutral</td>
<td>$267.00</td>
<td>$270.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Meyer Shields</td>
<td>Keefe, Bruyette &amp; Woods</td>
<td>Lowers</td>
<td>Outperform</td>
<td>$274.00</td>
<td>$286.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Elyse Greenspan</td>
<td>Wells Fargo</td>
<td>Raises</td>
<td>Equal-Weight</td>
<td>$247.00</td>
<td>$225.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Jimmy Bhullar</td>
<td>JP Morgan</td>
<td>Raises</td>
<td>Underweight</td>
<td>$271.00</td>
<td>$260.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Meyer Shields</td>
<td>Keefe, Bruyette &amp; Woods</td>
<td>Raises</td>
<td>Outperform</td>
<td>$286.00</td>
<td>$275.00</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<h3>Key Insights:</h3>
<ul>
<li>Action Taken: Analysts respond to changes in market conditions and company performance, frequently updating their recommendations. Whether they 'Maintain', 'Raise' or 'Lower' their stance, it reflects their reaction to recent developments related to Travelers Companies. This information offers a snapshot of how analysts perceive the current state of the company.</li>
<li>Rating: Unveiling insights, analysts deliver qualitative insights into stock performance, from 'Outperform' to 'Underperform'. These ratings convey expectations for the relative performance of Travelers Companies compared to the broader market.</li>
<li>Price Targets: Understanding forecasts, analysts offer estimates for Travelers Companies's future value. Examining the current and prior targets provides insight into analysts' changing expectations.</li>
</ul>
Considering these analyst evaluations in conjunction with other financial indicators can offer a comprehensive understanding of Travelers Companies's market position. Stay informed and make well-informed decisions with our Ratings Table.
<a href="https://www.benzinga.com/quote/TRV/analyst-ratings?adType=benzinga-insights&amp;ad=analyst-ratings&amp;campaign=wallstreetadvantage">Stay up to date on Travelers Companies analyst ratings.</a>
<h2>All You Need to Know About Travelers Companies</h2>
Travelers offers a broad product range and participates in both commercial and personal insurance lines. Its commercial operations offer a variety of coverage types for companies of any size but concentrate on serving midsize businesses. Its personal lines are roughly evenly split between auto and homeowners insurance.
<h3>Key Indicators: Travelers Companies's Financial Health</h3>
Market Capitalization Highlights: Above the industry average, the company's market capitalization signifies a significant scale, indicating strong confidence and market prominence.
Revenue Growth: Travelers Companies's revenue growth over a period of 3M has been noteworthy. As of 31 March, 2025, the company achieved a revenue growth rate of approximately 5.18%. This indicates a substantial increase in the company's top-line earnings. In comparison to its industry peers, the company stands out with a growth rate higher than the average among peers in the Financials sector.
Net Margin: Travelers Companies's net margin lags behind industry averages, suggesting challenges in maintaining strong profitability. With a net margin of 3.32%, the company may face hurdles in effective cost management.
Return on Equity (ROE): The company's ROE is below industry benchmarks, signaling potential difficulties in efficiently using equity capital. With an ROE of 1.4%, the company may need to address challenges in generating satisfactory returns for shareholders.
Return on Assets (ROA): Travelers Companies's ROA is below industry standards, pointing towards difficulties in efficiently utilizing assets. With an ROA of 0.29%, the company may encounter challenges in delivering satisfactory returns from its assets.
Debt Management: With a below-average debt-to-equity ratio of 0.28, Travelers Companies adopts a prudent financial strategy, indicating a balanced approach to debt management.
<h2>What Are Analyst Ratings?</h2>
Ratings come from analysts, or specialists within banking and financial systems that report for specific stocks or defined sectors (typically once per quarter for each stock). Analysts usually derive their information from company conference calls and meetings, financial statements, and conversations with important insiders to reach their decisions.
Analysts may enhance their evaluations by incorporating forecasts for metrics like growth estimates, earnings, and revenue, delivering additional guidance to investors. It is vital to acknowledge that, although experts in stocks and sectors, analysts are human and express their opinions when providing insights.
Breaking: Wall Street's Next Big Mover
Benzinga's #1 analyst just identified a stock poised for explosive growth. This under-the-radar company could surge 200%+ as major market shifts unfold. <a href="https://www.benzinga.com/premium/ideas/turning-point-trader-checkout-2/?t=Tu1tu3arja3be22tu36&amp;adType=benzinga-insights&amp;ad=analyst-ratings&amp;campaign=wallstreetadvantag">Click here for urgent details</a>.
This article was generated by Benzinga's automated content engine and reviewed by an editor.

Beyond The Numbers: 11 Analysts Discuss Travelers Companies Stock

Analysts' ratings for JM Smucker (NYSE:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/SJM#NYSE">SJM</a>) over the last quarter vary from bullish to bearish, as provided by 5 analysts.
Summarizing their recent assessments, the table below illustrates the evolving sentiments in the past 30 days and compares them to the preceding months.
<table>
<thead>
<tr>
<th></th>
<th align="right">Bullish</th>
<th align="right">Somewhat Bullish</th>
<th align="right">Indifferent</th>
<th align="right">Somewhat Bearish</th>
<th align="right">Bearish</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>Total Ratings</td>
<td align="right">2</td>
<td align="right">1</td>
<td align="right">2</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Last 30D</td>
<td align="right">1</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>1M Ago</td>
<td align="right">1</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>2M Ago</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
<td align="right">1</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>3M Ago</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
<td align="right">2</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
Analysts have set 12-month price targets for JM Smucker, revealing an average target of $124.8, a high estimate of $134.00, and a low estimate of $119.00. Observing a 0.1% increase, the current average has risen from the previous average price target of $124.67. 
<img src="https://www.benzinga.com/files/images/story/2025/1747692069_0.png" alt="price target chart" />
<h2>Interpreting Analyst Ratings: A Closer Look</h2>
The standing of JM Smucker among financial experts is revealed through an in-depth exploration of recent analyst actions. The summary below outlines key analysts, their recent evaluations, and adjustments to ratings and price targets.
<table>
<thead>
<tr>
<th>Analyst</th>
<th>Analyst Firm</th>
<th>Action Taken</th>
<th>Rating</th>
<th>Current Price Target</th>
<th>Prior Price Target</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>Thomas Palmer</td>
<td>Citigroup</td>
<td>Lowers</td>
<td>Buy</td>
<td>$128.00</td>
<td>$129.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Peter Grom</td>
<td>UBS</td>
<td>Announces</td>
<td>Buy</td>
<td>$134.00</td>
<td>-</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Megan Alexander</td>
<td>Morgan Stanley</td>
<td>Announces</td>
<td>Overweight</td>
<td>$123.00</td>
<td>-</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Brian Holland</td>
<td>DA Davidson</td>
<td>Lowers</td>
<td>Neutral</td>
<td>$120.00</td>
<td>$122.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Andrew Lazar</td>
<td>Barclays</td>
<td>Lowers</td>
<td>Equal-Weight</td>
<td>$119.00</td>
<td>$123.00</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<h3>Key Insights:</h3>
<ul>
<li>Action Taken: Analysts frequently update their recommendations based on evolving market conditions and company performance. Whether they 'Maintain', 'Raise' or 'Lower' their stance, it reflects their reaction to recent developments related to JM Smucker. This information provides a snapshot of how analysts perceive the current state of the company.</li>
<li>Rating: Analyzing trends, analysts offer qualitative evaluations, ranging from 'Outperform' to 'Underperform'. These ratings convey expectations for the relative performance of JM Smucker compared to the broader market.</li>
<li>Price Targets: Analysts set price targets as an estimate of a stock's future value. Comparing the current and prior price targets provides insight into how analysts' expectations have changed over time. This information can be valuable for investors seeking to understand consensus views on the stock's potential future performance.</li>
</ul>
Analyzing these analyst evaluations alongside relevant financial metrics can provide a comprehensive view of JM Smucker's market position. Stay informed and make data-driven decisions with the assistance of our Ratings Table.
<a href="https://www.benzinga.com/quote/SJM/analyst-ratings?adType=benzinga-insights&amp;ad=analyst-ratings&amp;campaign=wallstreetadvantage">Stay up to date on JM Smucker analyst ratings.</a>
<h2>Delving into JM Smucker's Background</h2>
J.M. Smucker is a packaged food company that primarily sells through the US retail channel (78% of fiscal 2024 revenue came through its retail pet foods, coffee, and frozen handheld/spreads segments), with the remaining share consisting of Hostess and international (primarily Canada). Retail coffee is its largest category (33% of sales) with brands Folgers and Dunkin'. Pet foods (22% of sales) holds leading brands like Milk-Bone and Meow Mix. Of its remaining, approximately 22% comes from consumer foods, primarily peanut butter and jelly, through brands Jif and Smucker's. The company acquired Hostess Brands in fiscal 2024 to boost its snack and convenience store presence.
<h3>Breaking Down JM Smucker's Financial Performance</h3>
Market Capitalization Analysis: Positioned below industry benchmarks, the company's market capitalization faces constraints in size. This could be influenced by factors such as growth expectations or operational capacity.
Decline in Revenue: Over the 3M period, JM Smucker faced challenges, resulting in a decline of approximately -1.94% in revenue growth as of 31 January, 2025. This signifies a reduction in the company's top-line earnings. In comparison to its industry peers, the company trails behind with a growth rate lower than the average among peers in the Consumer Staples sector.
Net Margin: JM Smucker's net margin is below industry standards, pointing towards difficulties in achieving strong profitability. With a net margin of -30.3%, the company may encounter challenges in effective cost control.
Return on Equity (ROE): JM Smucker's ROE is below industry averages, indicating potential challenges in efficiently utilizing equity capital. With an ROE of -9.11%, the company may face hurdles in achieving optimal financial returns.
Return on Assets (ROA): The company's ROA is below industry benchmarks, signaling potential difficulties in efficiently utilizing assets. With an ROA of -3.45%, the company may need to address challenges in generating satisfactory returns from its assets.
Debt Management: The company faces challenges in debt management with a debt-to-equity ratio higher than the industry average. With a ratio of 1.15, caution is advised due to increased financial risk.
<h2>The Basics of Analyst Ratings</h2>
Experts in banking and financial systems, analysts specialize in reporting for specific stocks or defined sectors. Their comprehensive research involves attending company conference calls and meetings, analyzing financial statements, and engaging with insiders to generate what are known as analyst ratings for stocks. Typically, analysts assess and rate each stock once per quarter.
Some analysts publish their predictions for metrics such as growth estimates, earnings, and revenue to provide additional guidance with their ratings. When using analyst ratings, it is important to keep in mind that stock and sector analysts are also human and are only offering their opinions to investors.
If you want to keep track of which analysts are outperforming others, you can view updated analyst ratings along withanalyst success scores in <a href="https://www.benzinga.com/pro/">Benzinga Pro</a>.
Breaking: Wall Street's Next Big Mover
Benzinga's #1 analyst just identified a stock poised for explosive growth. This under-the-radar company could surge 200%+ as major market shifts unfold. <a href="https://www.benzinga.com/premium/ideas/turning-point-trader-checkout-2/?t=Tu1tu3arja3be22tu36&amp;adType=benzinga-insights&amp;ad=analyst-ratings&amp;campaign=wallstreetadvantag">Click here for urgent details</a>.
This article was generated by Benzinga's automated content engine and reviewed by an editor.

Analyst Expectations For JM Smucker's Future

In the current market session, PG&amp;E Inc. (NYSE:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/PCG#NYSE">PCG</a>) share price is at $17.86, after a 0.05% drop. Over the past month, the stock spiked by 1.72%, but over the past year, it actually decreased by 6.24%. With good short-term performance like this, and questionable long-term performance, long-term shareholders might want to start looking into the company's price-to-earnings ratio.

<img src="https://www.benzinga.com/files/images/story/2025/1747692068_0.png" alt="Past Year Chart" />

<h3>PG&amp;E P/E Ratio Analysis in Relation to Industry Peers</h3>
The P/E ratio is used by long-term shareholders to assess the company's market performance against aggregate market data, historical earnings, and the industry at large. A lower P/E could indicate that shareholders do not expect the stock to perform better in the future or it could mean that the company is undervalued. 
PG&amp;E has a lower P/E than the aggregate P/E of 19.67 of the Electric Utilities industry. Ideally, one might believe that the stock might perform worse than its peers, but it's also probable that the stock is undervalued. 

<img src="https://www.benzinga.com/files/images/story/2025/1747692068_1.png" alt="Guage" />

In conclusion, the price-to-earnings ratio is a useful metric for analyzing a company's market performance, but it has its limitations. While a lower P/E can indicate that a company is undervalued, it can also suggest that shareholders do not expect future growth. Additionally, the P/E ratio should not be used in isolation, as other factors such as industry trends and business cycles can also impact a company's stock price. Therefore, investors should use the P/E ratio in conjunction with other financial metrics and qualitative analysis to make informed investment decisions.

Intraday Update

Price Over Earnings Overview: PG&E

Ratings for Marvell Tech (NASDAQ:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/MRVL#NASDAQ">MRVL</a>) were provided by 18 analysts in the past three months, showcasing a mix of bullish and bearish perspectives.
The table below provides a snapshot of their recent ratings, showcasing how sentiments have evolved over the past 30 days and comparing them to the preceding months.
<table>
<thead>
<tr>
<th></th>
<th align="right">Bullish</th>
<th align="right">Somewhat Bullish</th>
<th align="right">Indifferent</th>
<th align="right">Somewhat Bearish</th>
<th align="right">Bearish</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>Total Ratings</td>
<td align="right">12</td>
<td align="right">4</td>
<td align="right">2</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Last 30D</td>
<td align="right">1</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>1M Ago</td>
<td align="right">1</td>
<td align="right">1</td>
<td align="right">1</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>2M Ago</td>
<td align="right">3</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>3M Ago</td>
<td align="right">7</td>
<td align="right">3</td>
<td align="right">1</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
The 12-month price targets, analyzed by analysts, offer insights with an average target of $103.06, a high estimate of $140.00, and a low estimate of $60.00. This current average represents a 19.85% decrease from the previous average price target of $128.59. 
<img src="https://www.benzinga.com/files/images/story/2025/1747692061_0.png" alt="price target chart" />
<h2>Decoding Analyst Ratings: A Detailed Look</h2>
The standing of Marvell Tech among financial experts is revealed through an in-depth exploration of recent analyst actions. The summary below outlines key analysts, their recent evaluations, and adjustments to ratings and price targets.
<table>
<thead>
<tr>
<th>Analyst</th>
<th>Analyst Firm</th>
<th>Action Taken</th>
<th>Rating</th>
<th>Current Price Target</th>
<th>Prior Price Target</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>Timothy Arcuri</td>
<td>UBS</td>
<td>Lowers</td>
<td>Buy</td>
<td>$100.00</td>
<td>$110.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Cody Acree</td>
<td>Benchmark</td>
<td>Lowers</td>
<td>Buy</td>
<td>$95.00</td>
<td>$135.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Matthew Prisco</td>
<td>Cantor Fitzgerald</td>
<td>Lowers</td>
<td>Neutral</td>
<td>$60.00</td>
<td>$125.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Thomas O'Malley</td>
<td>Barclays</td>
<td>Lowers</td>
<td>Overweight</td>
<td>$80.00</td>
<td>$130.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Tore Svanberg</td>
<td>Stifel</td>
<td>Lowers</td>
<td>Buy</td>
<td>$80.00</td>
<td>$115.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Vivek Arya</td>
<td>B of A Securities</td>
<td>Lowers</td>
<td>Buy</td>
<td>$72.00</td>
<td>$120.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Atif Malik</td>
<td>Citigroup</td>
<td>Lowers</td>
<td>Buy</td>
<td>$96.00</td>
<td>$122.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Joseph Moore</td>
<td>Morgan Stanley</td>
<td>Lowers</td>
<td>Equal-Weight</td>
<td>$90.00</td>
<td>$113.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Tore Svanberg</td>
<td>Stifel</td>
<td>Lowers</td>
<td>Buy</td>
<td>$115.00</td>
<td>$130.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Atif Malik</td>
<td>Citigroup</td>
<td>Lowers</td>
<td>Buy</td>
<td>$122.00</td>
<td>$136.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Gary Mobley</td>
<td>Loop Capital</td>
<td>Announces</td>
<td>Buy</td>
<td>$110.00</td>
<td>-</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Harsh Kumar</td>
<td>Piper Sandler</td>
<td>Lowers</td>
<td>Overweight</td>
<td>$95.00</td>
<td>$120.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Thomas O'Malley</td>
<td>Barclays</td>
<td>Lowers</td>
<td>Overweight</td>
<td>$130.00</td>
<td>$150.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>John Vinh</td>
<td>Keybanc</td>
<td>Lowers</td>
<td>Overweight</td>
<td>$115.00</td>
<td>$135.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Vivek Arya</td>
<td>B of A Securities</td>
<td>Lowers</td>
<td>Buy</td>
<td>$120.00</td>
<td>$150.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Cody Acree</td>
<td>Benchmark</td>
<td>Maintains</td>
<td>Buy</td>
<td>$135.00</td>
<td>$135.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Kevin Cassidy</td>
<td>Rosenblatt</td>
<td>Maintains</td>
<td>Buy</td>
<td>$140.00</td>
<td>$140.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Quinn Bolton</td>
<td>Needham</td>
<td>Lowers</td>
<td>Buy</td>
<td>$100.00</td>
<td>$120.00</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<h3>Key Insights:</h3>
<ul>
<li>Action Taken: In response to dynamic market conditions and company performance, analysts update their recommendations. Whether they 'Maintain', 'Raise', or 'Lower' their stance, it signifies their reaction to recent developments related to Marvell Tech. This insight gives a snapshot of analysts' perspectives on the current state of the company.</li>
<li>Rating: Analysts unravel qualitative evaluations for stocks, ranging from 'Outperform' to 'Underperform'. These ratings offer insights into expectations for the relative performance of Marvell Tech compared to the broader market.</li>
<li>Price Targets: Delving into movements, analysts provide estimates for the future value of Marvell Tech's stock. This analysis reveals shifts in analysts' expectations over time.</li>
</ul>
Assessing these analyst evaluations alongside crucial financial indicators can provide a comprehensive overview of Marvell Tech's market position. Stay informed and make well-judged decisions with the assistance of our Ratings Table.
<a href="https://www.benzinga.com/quote/MRVL/analyst-ratings?adType=benzinga-insights&amp;ad=analyst-ratings&amp;campaign=wallstreetadvantage">Stay up to date on Marvell Tech analyst ratings.</a>
<h2>About Marvell Tech</h2>
Marvell Technology is a fabless chip designer focused on wired networking, where it has the second-highest market share. Marvell serves the data center, carrier, enterprise, automotive, and consumer end markets with processors, optical and copper transceivers, switches, and storage controllers.
<h3>Financial Insights: Marvell Tech</h3>
Market Capitalization: Indicating a reduced size compared to industry averages, the company's market capitalization poses unique challenges.
Revenue Growth: Marvell Tech displayed positive results in 3M. As of 31 January, 2025, the company achieved a solid revenue growth rate of approximately 27.4%. This indicates a notable increase in the company's top-line earnings. As compared to competitors, the company surpassed expectations with a growth rate higher than the average among peers in the Information Technology sector.
Net Margin: Marvell Tech's net margin falls below industry averages, indicating challenges in achieving strong profitability. With a net margin of 11.02%, the company may face hurdles in effective cost management.
Return on Equity (ROE): Marvell Tech's ROE falls below industry averages, indicating challenges in efficiently using equity capital. With an ROE of 1.49%, the company may face hurdles in generating optimal returns for shareholders.
Return on Assets (ROA): Marvell Tech's ROA is below industry averages, indicating potential challenges in efficiently utilizing assets. With an ROA of 1.0%, the company may face hurdles in achieving optimal financial returns.
Debt Management: The company faces challenges in debt management with a debt-to-equity ratio higher than the industry average. With a ratio of 0.32, caution is advised due to increased financial risk.
<h2>The Core of Analyst Ratings: What Every Investor Should Know</h2>
Experts in banking and financial systems, analysts specialize in reporting for specific stocks or defined sectors. Their comprehensive research involves attending company conference calls and meetings, analyzing financial statements, and engaging with insiders to generate what are known as analyst ratings for stocks. Typically, analysts assess and rate each stock once per quarter.
Analysts may enhance their evaluations by incorporating forecasts for metrics like growth estimates, earnings, and revenue, delivering additional guidance to investors. It is vital to acknowledge that, although experts in stocks and sectors, analysts are human and express their opinions when providing insights.
Breaking: Wall Street's Next Big Mover
Benzinga's #1 analyst just identified a stock poised for explosive growth. This under-the-radar company could surge 200%+ as major market shifts unfold. <a href="https://www.benzinga.com/premium/ideas/turning-point-trader-checkout-2/?t=Tu1tu3arja3be22tu36&amp;adType=benzinga-insights&amp;ad=analyst-ratings&amp;campaign=wallstreetadvantag">Click here for urgent details</a>.
This article was generated by Benzinga's automated content engine and reviewed by an editor.

MRVL

Demystifying Marvell Tech: Insights From 18 Analyst Reviews

Across the recent three months, 10 analysts have shared their insights on PENN Entertainment (NASDAQ:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/PENN#NASDAQ">PENN</a>), expressing a variety of opinions spanning from bullish to bearish.
In the table below, you'll find a summary of their recent ratings, revealing the shifting sentiments over the past 30 days and comparing them to the previous months.
<table>
<thead>
<tr>
<th></th>
<th align="right">Bullish</th>
<th align="right">Somewhat Bullish</th>
<th align="right">Indifferent</th>
<th align="right">Somewhat Bearish</th>
<th align="right">Bearish</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>Total Ratings</td>
<td align="right">2</td>
<td align="right">4</td>
<td align="right">4</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Last 30D</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>1M Ago</td>
<td align="right">1</td>
<td align="right">1</td>
<td align="right">1</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>2M Ago</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
<td align="right">1</td>
<td align="right">1</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>3M Ago</td>
<td align="right">1</td>
<td align="right">2</td>
<td align="right">2</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
Providing deeper insights, analysts have established 12-month price targets, indicating an average target of $22.85, along with a high estimate of $26.00 and a low estimate of $16.50. A negative shift in sentiment is evident as analysts have decreased the average price target by 3.79%. 
<img src="https://www.benzinga.com/files/images/story/2025/1747692047_0.png" alt="price target chart" />
<h2>Diving into Analyst Ratings: An In-Depth Exploration</h2>
A comprehensive examination of how financial experts perceive PENN Entertainment is derived from recent analyst actions. The following is a detailed summary of key analysts, their recent evaluations, and adjustments to ratings and price targets.
<table>
<thead>
<tr>
<th>Analyst</th>
<th>Analyst Firm</th>
<th>Action Taken</th>
<th>Rating</th>
<th>Current Price Target</th>
<th>Prior Price Target</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>Ben Chaiken</td>
<td>Mizuho</td>
<td>Lowers</td>
<td>Outperform</td>
<td>$24.00</td>
<td>$25.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Jason Tilchen</td>
<td>Canaccord Genuity</td>
<td>Lowers</td>
<td>Buy</td>
<td>$26.00</td>
<td>$28.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Barry Jonas</td>
<td>Truist Securities</td>
<td>Lowers</td>
<td>Hold</td>
<td>$20.00</td>
<td>$23.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Stephen Grambling</td>
<td>Morgan Stanley</td>
<td>Lowers</td>
<td>Equal-Weight</td>
<td>$16.50</td>
<td>$17.50</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Joseph Stauff</td>
<td>Susquehanna</td>
<td>Lowers</td>
<td>Positive</td>
<td>$23.00</td>
<td>$26.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Steven Wieczynski</td>
<td>Stifel</td>
<td>Lowers</td>
<td>Hold</td>
<td>$19.00</td>
<td>$22.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Ben Chaiken</td>
<td>Mizuho</td>
<td>Raises</td>
<td>Outperform</td>
<td>$25.00</td>
<td>$24.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Daniel Politzer</td>
<td>Wells Fargo</td>
<td>Raises</td>
<td>Equal-Weight</td>
<td>$24.00</td>
<td>$20.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Chad Beynon</td>
<td>Macquarie</td>
<td>Maintains</td>
<td>Outperform</td>
<td>$26.00</td>
<td>$26.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Bernie McTernan</td>
<td>Needham</td>
<td>Lowers</td>
<td>Buy</td>
<td>$25.00</td>
<td>$26.00</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<h3>Key Insights:</h3>
<ul>
<li>Action Taken: In response to dynamic market conditions and company performance, analysts update their recommendations. Whether they 'Maintain', 'Raise', or 'Lower' their stance, it signifies their reaction to recent developments related to PENN Entertainment. This insight gives a snapshot of analysts' perspectives on the current state of the company.</li>
<li>Rating: Delving into assessments, analysts assign qualitative values, from 'Outperform' to 'Underperform'. These ratings communicate expectations for the relative performance of PENN Entertainment compared to the broader market.</li>
<li>Price Targets: Analysts provide insights into price targets, offering estimates for the future value of PENN Entertainment's stock. This comparison reveals trends in analysts' expectations over time.</li>
</ul>
Understanding these analyst evaluations alongside key financial indicators can offer valuable insights into PENN Entertainment's market standing. Stay informed and make well-considered decisions with our Ratings Table.
<a href="https://www.benzinga.com/quote/PENN/analyst-ratings?adType=benzinga-insights&amp;ad=analyst-ratings&amp;campaign=wallstreetadvantage">Stay up to date on PENN Entertainment analyst ratings.</a>
<h2>About PENN Entertainment</h2>
Penn Entertainment's origins date back to its 1972 racetrack opening in Pennsylvania. Today, Penn operates 43 properties across 20 states and 12 brands, including Hollywood Casino and Ameristar. Land-based casinos represented 85% of total sales in 2024; 15% was from the interactive segment, which includes sports, iGaming, and media revenue. The retail portfolio generates mid-30s EBITDAR margins and helps position the company to obtain licenses for the digital wagering markets. Additionally, Penn's media assets, theScore and ESPN (starting with its partnership launch in November 2023), provide access to sports betting/iGaming technology and clientele, helping it form a leading digital position.
<h3>Key Indicators: PENN Entertainment's Financial Health</h3>
Market Capitalization Analysis: The company's market capitalization is below the industry average, suggesting that it is relatively smaller compared to peers. This could be due to various factors, including perceived growth potential or operational scale.
Revenue Growth: PENN Entertainment's remarkable performance in 3M is evident. As of 31 March, 2025, the company achieved an impressive revenue growth rate of 4.08%. This signifies a substantial increase in the company's top-line earnings. In comparison to its industry peers, the company trails behind with a growth rate lower than the average among peers in the Consumer Discretionary sector.
Net Margin: PENN Entertainment's financial strength is reflected in its exceptional net margin, which exceeds industry averages. With a remarkable net margin of 6.68%, the company showcases strong profitability and effective cost management.
Return on Equity (ROE): PENN Entertainment's ROE surpasses industry standards, highlighting the company's exceptional financial performance. With an impressive 3.83% ROE, the company effectively utilizes shareholder equity capital.
Return on Assets (ROA): PENN Entertainment's ROA is below industry averages, indicating potential challenges in efficiently utilizing assets. With an ROA of 0.74%, the company may face hurdles in achieving optimal financial returns.
Debt Management: PENN Entertainment's debt-to-equity ratio is below industry norms, indicating a sound financial structure with a ratio of 3.7.
<h2>The Core of Analyst Ratings: What Every Investor Should Know</h2>
Analysts are specialists within banking and financial systems that typically report for specific stocks or within defined sectors. These people research company financial statements, sit in conference calls and meetings, and speak with relevant insiders to determine what are known as analyst ratings for stocks. Typically, analysts will rate each stock once a quarter. 
Some analysts will also offer forecasts for metrics like growth estimates, earnings, and revenue to provide further guidance on stocks. Investors who use analyst ratings should note that this specialized advice comes from humans and may be subject to error.
Breaking: Wall Street's Next Big Mover
Benzinga's #1 analyst just identified a stock poised for explosive growth. This under-the-radar company could surge 200%+ as major market shifts unfold. <a href="https://www.benzinga.com/premium/ideas/turning-point-trader-checkout-2/?t=Tu1tu3arja3be22tu36&amp;adType=benzinga-insights&amp;ad=analyst-ratings&amp;campaign=wallstreetadvantag">Click here for urgent details</a>.
This article was generated by Benzinga's automated content engine and reviewed by an editor.

PENN

10 Analysts Assess PENN Entertainment: What You Need To Know

10 analysts have shared their evaluations of BorgWarner (NYSE:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/BWA#NYSE">BWA</a>) during the recent three months, expressing a mix of bullish and bearish perspectives.
The table below summarizes their recent ratings, showcasing the evolving sentiments within the past 30 days and comparing them to the preceding months.
<table>
<thead>
<tr>
<th></th>
<th align="right">Bullish</th>
<th align="right">Somewhat Bullish</th>
<th align="right">Indifferent</th>
<th align="right">Somewhat Bearish</th>
<th align="right">Bearish</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>Total Ratings</td>
<td align="right">2</td>
<td align="right">4</td>
<td align="right">4</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Last 30D</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
<td align="right">1</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>1M Ago</td>
<td align="right">1</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
<td align="right">2</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>2M Ago</td>
<td align="right">1</td>
<td align="right">2</td>
<td align="right">2</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>3M Ago</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
<td align="right">1</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
<td align="right">0</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
In the assessment of 12-month price targets, analysts unveil insights for BorgWarner, presenting an average target of $34.9, a high estimate of $44.00, and a low estimate of $29.00. A 5.93% drop is evident in the current average compared to the previous average price target of $37.10. 
<img src="https://www.benzinga.com/files/images/story/2025/1747692028_0.png" alt="price target chart" />
<h2>Interpreting Analyst Ratings: A Closer Look</h2>
The standing of BorgWarner among financial experts becomes clear with a thorough analysis of recent analyst actions. The summary below outlines key analysts, their recent evaluations, and adjustments to ratings and price targets.
<table>
<thead>
<tr>
<th>Analyst</th>
<th>Analyst Firm</th>
<th>Action Taken</th>
<th>Rating</th>
<th>Current Price Target</th>
<th>Prior Price Target</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>Colin Langan</td>
<td>Wells Fargo</td>
<td>Raises</td>
<td>Overweight</td>
<td>$44.00</td>
<td>$40.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Joseph Spak</td>
<td>UBS</td>
<td>Raises</td>
<td>Neutral</td>
<td>$35.00</td>
<td>$31.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>David Leiker</td>
<td>Baird</td>
<td>Raises</td>
<td>Neutral</td>
<td>$32.00</td>
<td>$29.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Ronald Jewsikow</td>
<td>Guggenheim</td>
<td>Lowers</td>
<td>Buy</td>
<td>$33.00</td>
<td>$38.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Dan Levy</td>
<td>Barclays</td>
<td>Lowers</td>
<td>Overweight</td>
<td>$35.00</td>
<td>$42.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>David Leiker</td>
<td>Baird</td>
<td>Lowers</td>
<td>Neutral</td>
<td>$29.00</td>
<td>$34.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Joseph Spak</td>
<td>UBS</td>
<td>Lowers</td>
<td>Neutral</td>
<td>$31.00</td>
<td>$38.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Kash Rangan</td>
<td>Goldman Sachs</td>
<td>Raises</td>
<td>Buy</td>
<td>$34.00</td>
<td>$31.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Alexander Potter</td>
<td>Piper Sandler</td>
<td>Lowers</td>
<td>Overweight</td>
<td>$36.00</td>
<td>$43.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Adam Jonas</td>
<td>Morgan Stanley</td>
<td>Lowers</td>
<td>Overweight</td>
<td>$40.00</td>
<td>$45.00</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<h3>Key Insights:</h3>
<ul>
<li>Action Taken: Analysts frequently update their recommendations based on evolving market conditions and company performance. Whether they 'Maintain', 'Raise' or 'Lower' their stance, it reflects their reaction to recent developments related to BorgWarner. This information provides a snapshot of how analysts perceive the current state of the company.</li>
<li>Rating: Offering insights into predictions, analysts assign qualitative values, from 'Outperform' to 'Underperform'. These ratings convey expectations for the relative performance of BorgWarner compared to the broader market.</li>
<li>Price Targets: Analysts set price targets as an estimate of a stock's future value. Comparing the current and prior price targets provides insight into how analysts' expectations have changed over time. This information can be valuable for investors seeking to understand consensus views on the stock's potential future performance.</li>
</ul>
Understanding these analyst evaluations alongside key financial indicators can offer valuable insights into BorgWarner's market standing. Stay informed and make well-considered decisions with our Ratings Table.
<a href="https://www.benzinga.com/quote/BWA/analyst-ratings?adType=benzinga-insights&amp;ad=analyst-ratings&amp;campaign=wallstreetadvantage">Stay up to date on BorgWarner analyst ratings.</a>
<h2>Delving into BorgWarner's Background</h2>
BorgWarner is a tier one supplier of turbo and thermal management technologies, drivetrain systems, powerdrive systems, and battery and charging systems mostly to automotive original equipment manufacturers. Its products aim to move a vehicle with as few electrons as possible, resulting in cleaner, cost-optimized, and more-efficient vehicles. Foundational products, the combustion vehicle business, contributes more than 80% to group revenue while BorgWarner transitions to becoming an electric vehicle-centric parts supplier (e-business). In 2023, 25% of the company's revenue was sourced from Volkswagen and Ford. Revenue is well diversified geographically, with approximately a third each generated in North America, Europe, and Asia.
<h3>Unraveling the Financial Story of BorgWarner</h3>
Market Capitalization Analysis: The company's market capitalization is above the industry average, indicating that it is relatively larger in size compared to peers. This may suggest a higher level of investor confidence and market recognition.
Decline in Revenue: Over the 3M period, BorgWarner faced challenges, resulting in a decline of approximately -2.23% in revenue growth as of 31 March, 2025. This signifies a reduction in the company's top-line earnings. As compared to its peers, the revenue growth lags behind its industry peers. The company achieved a growth rate lower than the average among peers in Consumer Discretionary sector.
Net Margin: The company's net margin is a standout performer, exceeding industry averages. With an impressive net margin of 4.47%, the company showcases strong profitability and effective cost control.
Return on Equity (ROE): BorgWarner's financial strength is reflected in its exceptional ROE, which exceeds industry averages. With a remarkable ROE of 2.79%, the company showcases efficient use of equity capital and strong financial health.
Return on Assets (ROA): BorgWarner's ROA stands out, surpassing industry averages. With an impressive ROA of 1.13%, the company demonstrates effective utilization of assets and strong financial performance.
Debt Management: The company maintains a balanced debt approach with a debt-to-equity ratio below industry norms, standing at 0.71.
<h2>What Are Analyst Ratings?</h2>
Experts in banking and financial systems, analysts specialize in reporting for specific stocks or defined sectors. Their comprehensive research involves attending company conference calls and meetings, analyzing financial statements, and engaging with insiders to generate what are known as analyst ratings for stocks. Typically, analysts assess and rate each stock once per quarter.
In addition to their assessments, some analysts extend their insights by offering predictions for key metrics such as earnings, revenue, and growth estimates. This supplementary information provides further guidance for traders. It is crucial to recognize that, despite their specialization, analysts are human and can only provide forecasts based on their beliefs.
Which Stocks Are Analysts Recommending Now?
Benzinga Edge gives you instant access to all major analyst upgrades, downgrades, and price targets. Sort by accuracy, upside potential, and more. <a href="https://www.benzinga.com/premium/ideas/benzinga-edge-checkout/?t=be8be9arja3be22bz21&amp;adType=benzinga-insights&amp;ad=analyst-ratings&amp;campaign=wallstreetadvantage">Click here to stay ahead of the market</a>.
This article was generated by Benzinga's automated content engine and reviewed by an editor.

Assessing BorgWarner: Insights From 10 Financial Analysts

Goldman Sachs Group (NYSE:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/GS#NYSE">GS</a>) has outperformed the market over the past 5 years by 12.73% on an annualized basis producing an average annual return of 27.75%. Currently, Goldman Sachs Group has a market capitalization of $191.20 billion. 
Buying $100 In GS: If an investor had bought $100 of GS stock 5 years ago, it would be worth $339.98 today based on a price of $612.75 for GS at the time of writing.
<h3>Goldman Sachs Group's Performance Over Last 5 Years</h3>
<img src="https://www.benzinga.com/files/images/story/2025/1747692015_0.png" alt="comp_fig" />
Finally -- what's the point of all this? The key insight to take from this article is to note how much of a difference compounded returns can make in your cash growth over a period of time.
This article was generated by Benzinga's automated content engine and reviewed by an editor.

$100 Invested In Goldman Sachs Group 5 Years Ago Would Be Worth This Much Today

BioSig Technologies (NASDAQ:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/BSGM#NASDAQ">BSGM</a>) reported quarterly losses of $(0.14) per share. This is a 61.11 percent increase over losses of $(0.36) per share from the same period last year.

BSGM

BioSig Technologies Q1 EPS $(0.14) Up From $(0.36) YoY; Revenue 0.00 vs 14K YoY

Barstool Sports founder Dave Portnoy is no stranger to <a href="https://www.benzinga.com/general/sports-betting/24/06/39382135/portnoy-wins-big-with-boston-celtics-nba-championship-rapper-drake-loses-500k-and-could-lo">placing large wagers </a>on top sports outcomes and he made sure to get in on the action for the first Indiana Fever WNBA game of the 2025 season as a Caitlin Clark fan.
Portnoy's winnings were large and might illustrate the gap between WNBA and NBA salaries once again.
What Happened: The Fever were dominant in their first game of the season beating the Chicago Sky 93-58, a win that might have been heavily bet <a href="https://www.benzinga.com/general/sports-betting/24/04/38276225/caitlin-clark-is-no-1-pick-in-wnba-draft-media-stocks-sportsbooks-to-watch-as-iowa-star-go">on at sportsbooks </a>with Clark and Angel Reese featured, two former college basketball stars now in their second years in the WNBA.
Clark finished the game with 20 points, 10 rebounds and 10 assists, marking her third career triple double, a feat that occurs when a player has 10 or more in three different stat categories.
Portnoy <a href="https://x.com/stoolpresidente/status/1923859511560847516">predicted </a>Clark's triple double before the game, placing a $25,000 wager with DraftKings Inc (NASDAQ:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/DKNG#NASDAQ">DKNG</a>), a sportsbook he is partnered.
With the triple double, Portnoy's bet at odds of +1,300 paid out a total of $350,000 for a $325,000 profit.
The huge win isn't the largest by Portnoy and one of many examples of his large bets on sports contests.
The profit amount quickly took another direction on social media with people comparing the winnings to the WNBA salary of Clark and how it <a href="https://www.benzinga.com/markets/cannabis/22/08/28390094/this-lebron-james-stat-could-explain-why-brittney-griner-was-playing-in-russia">stacks up against the NBA. </a>
Clark, the first overall pick of the 2024 WNBA draft, had a salary of $76,535 in her rookie season and is set to make $78,066 in her second season. She will be paid $85,873 and $97,583 for the 2026 and 2027 seasons, respectively.
Clark's four-year rookie contract is worth $338,056. This means that Portnoy's profit on one Clark bet from her first 2025 game made him almost as much as the WNBA will pay Clark for her first four seasons in the league.
For comparison, the number one overall NBA pick in the 2024 draft Zaccharie Risacher earned a four-year $57 million contract.
While most WNBA players will earn less than NBA players, Clark will be one of the top earners thanks to endorsement deals. As <a href="https://www.benzinga.com/general/sports/24/04/38409019/caitlin-clark-nears-28m-nike-endorsement-sneaker-deal-45-times-her-wnba-salary">Benzinga previously reported,</a> Clark landed a $28 million eight-year deal with Nike Inc (NYSE:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/NKE#NYSE">NKE</a>). That deal pays out over 45x the first-year salary for Clark.
According to <a href="https://www.sportico.com/personalities/athletes/2024/caitlin-clark-wnba-salary-pay-endorsement-earnings-1234819038/">Sportico</a>, Clark is one of the highest-paid female athletes with $11 million in earnings from endorsements. Along with Nike, Clark as deals with the likes of Gatorade, State Farm, Wilson, Xfinity and Panini.
Read Also: <a href="https://www.benzinga.com/general/sports/25/05/45303072/draftkings-q1-earnings-highlights-revenue-miss-eps-miss-guidance-cut-after-bettors-beat-the-house">DraftKings Q1 Earnings Highlights: Revenue Miss, EPS Miss, Guidance Cut After Bettors Beat The House</a>
What's Next: Expectations are high for the Indiana Fever and Clark in the 2025 season. The team ranks second in betting odds to win the WNBA championship with odds of +340, trailing only the defending champion New York Liberty at +225 according to sportsbook DraftKings. 
Clark is the favorite to win the WNBA MVP at odds of +165, ranking ahead of last year's runner-up Napheesa Collier (+250) and last year's winner A'ja Wilson (+275).
Portnoy said the Fever are the team to beat and Clark could go on to win the MVP championship.
"Fever look great. Caitlin Clark looks like she's gonna be the MVP of the league."
Betting $100 on the Fever to win the WNBA Championship will pay out a profit of $340 if Portnoy is right. Betting $100 on Clark to win MVP would pay out a profit of $165.
Read Next:
<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li><a href="https://www.benzinga.com/general/sports-betting/24/02/37239149/exclusive-draftkings-partnership-with-barstool-sports-getting-the-band-together-ceo-says-h">EXCLUSIVE: DraftKings Partnership With Barstool Sports &#8216;Getting The Band Together,&#8217; CEO Says — How New Deal, Jackpocket Acquisition Can Power Growth</a></li>
</ul>
Photos: Shutterstock

Sports Betting

Sports

DKNG

Dave Portnoy's Big Caitlin Clark Bet Profits $325K, Nearly The Same Amount Of WNBA Star's Four-Year Salary

<a href="https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2025-05-19/nike-lays-off-some-workers-in-shakeup-of-technology-division?embedded-checkout=true">https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2025-05-19/nike-lays-off-some-workers-in-shakeup-of-technology-division?embedded-checkout=true</a>

'Nike Lays Off Some Workers in Shakeup of Technology Division'- Bloomberg

<a href="https://www.reuters.com/business/autos-transportation/gm-stop-exporting-vehicles-us-china-company-says-2025-05-19/#:~:text=DETROIT%2C%20May%2019%20(Reuters),United%20States%2C%20the%20company%20said">https://www.reuters.com/business/autos-transportation/gm-stop-exporting-vehicles-us-china-company-says-2025-05-19/#:~:text=DETROIT%2C%20May%2019%20(Reuters),United%20States%2C%20the%20company%20said</a>

'GM to stop exporting vehicles from US to China, company says'- Reuters

Sunrise Communications (NASDAQ:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/SNRE#NASDAQ">SNRE</a>) reported Q1 EPS CHF 0.00; Sales CHF 722.1M

SNRE

Sunrise Communications Q1 EPS CHF 0.00; Sales CHF 722.1M

엔비디아(NASDAQ:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/NVDA#NASDAQ">NVDA</a>)가 월요일에 200일 이동평균선을 하회하면서 주요 기술적 지지선을 돌파하며 하회했다. 이는 딥시크(DeepSeek)라는 중국의 오픈소스 인공지능(AI) 플랫폼 출시 후 발생한 엄청난 매도세로 인해 <a href="https://www.benzinga.com/economics/macro-economic-events/25/01/43244872/tech-stocks-tumble-on-ai-nightmare-nvidia-eyes-worst-day-since-march-2020-bitcoin-drops-below-100000-whats-driving-markets-monday">엔비디아의 프리미엄 칩에 대한 수요</a>에 대한 투자자 우려가 촉발된 후 발생한 일이다.
<h3 class="wp-block-heading">엔비디아, 주요 기술적 지지를 잃다: AI 대변동의 여파</h3>
엔비디아의 주가는 월요일 16.86% 급락한 118.58달러로 마감하며 2020년 3월 18일 이후 최악의 하루를 기록했다. 이 하락은 주가가 2023년 1월 12일부터 200일 이동평균선 위에 머물러 있었던 것을 크게 리셋시키는 결과를 가져왔다.
이 미국 최대 반도체 회사는 또한 시가총액이 6천억 달러 이상 증발하며, 미국 주식 시장 역사상 가장 큰 단일일 손실을 기록했다. 월요일 엔비디아의 시가총액이 3조 달러에 못 미치는 2.9조 달러를 기록했다.
엔비디아의 주식을 추적하는 레버리지 상장지수펀드(ETF)인 Direxion Daily NVDA Bull 2X Shares(NASDAQ:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/NVDU#NASDAQ">NVDU</a>)와 GraniteShares 2x Long NVDA Daily ETF(NASDAQ:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/NVDL#NASDAQ">NVDL</a>)는 각각 33.80% 및 33.78% 급락 마감했다.
<figure class="wp-block-image size-large"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" class="wp-image-752092" src="https://editorial-assets.benzinga.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/01/27151351/image-210-1024x506.png" sizes="(max-width: 1024px) 100vw, 1024px" srcset="https://editorial-assets.benzinga.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/01/27151351/image-210-1024x506.png 1024w,https://editorial-assets.benzinga.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/01/27151351/image-210-300x148.png 300w,https://editorial-assets.benzinga.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/01/27151351/image-210-768x380.png 768w,https://editorial-assets.benzinga.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/01/27151351/image-210-1536x759.png 1536w,https://editorial-assets.benzinga.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/01/27151351/image-210.png 1920w" alt="" width="1024" height="506" /></figure>
<h3 class="wp-block-heading">딥시크의 AI 급증, 시장 기대치를 재편</h3>
CFTC 규제 플랫폼인 칼시(Kalshi)에서 딥시크가 &#8220;올해의 AI 모델&#8221;에서 승리할 확률이 월요일에 25%에서 46%로 급증했다. 이 급증은 중국의 대형 언어 모델이 앱 스토어 다운로드에서 압도적인 점유율을 차지하며 강력한 초기 채택 신호를 보인 후 발생했다.
데이비드 반센(David Bahnsen), 더 반센 그룹(The Bahnsen Group)의 최고 투자 책임자는 &#8220;월요일의 기술 매도세는 근본적인 촉매제에 의해 주도되고 있다: 딥시크가 사용량에서 챗GPT를 능가하고 엔비디아의 최신 칩에 대한 수요를 줄일 수 있다는 우려이다&#8221;라고 말했다.
데이비드 모리슨(David Morrison), 트레이드 네이션(Trade Nation)의 선임 시장 분석가는 딥시크가 &#8220;비용의 일부로, 덜 강력한 엔비디아 칩을 사용하여 미국 수출 규제를 효과적으로 우회했다&#8221;고 강조했다.
엔비디아의 다음 실적 보고서는 한 달 후에 예정되어 있으며, 월스트리트는 AI 중심의 자본 지출이 매출 성장보다 빠르게 진행되고 있는지 여부를 평가하고 있다.
에드 야데니(Ed Yardeni), 베테랑 시장 전략가는 &#8220;핵심 질문은 엔비디아가 실망할 것인지이다. AI에 대한 자본 지출이 매출보다 빠르게 증가하고 있어 이익률에 압박을 가할 수 있다&#8221;고 말했다.
<h3 class="wp-block-heading">딥시크의 부상에 대한 보안 우려</h3>
사이버 보안 전문가인 아드리아누스 워멘호벤(Adrianus Warmenhoven)은 딥시크의 빠른 채택이 심각한 개인 정보 보호 및 보안 우려를 불러일으킨다고 경고했다. 특히 중국의 엄격한 규제 환경을 감안할 때 더욱 그렇다.
&#8220;딥시크와 같은 스타트업의 출현은 사용자 보안에 대한 기회와 위험을 모두 제공한다. 이러한 플랫폼은 특히 전 세계 데이터 개인 정보 보호 법률의 차이로 인해 신중하게 접근해야 한다&#8221;고 워멘호벤이 말했다.
그는 중국 정부의 데이터 수집, 저장 및 사용에 대한 감독과 관련된 잠재적 위험을 강조하며, 중국 외부 사용자들은 자신의 딥시크와의 상호작용이 어떻게 추적되고 처리되는지 주의해야 한다고 덧붙였다.
&#8220;중국은 세계에서 가장 엄격한 데이터 접근 및 국가 감시 규제를 가지고 있다. 딥시크가 국제적인 주목을 받게 된다면, 사용자들은 자신이 어떤 데이터를 공유하고 어디에 저장되는지 이해해야 한다&#8221;고 그가 말했다.
워멘호벤은 또한 AI 기반 애플리케이션이 사이버 위협의 주요 타겟이 되며, 딥시크의 갑작스러운 인기가 이를 악용할 수 있는 매력적인 경로로 만들 수 있다고 지적했다.
&#8220;우리는 과거에 새로운 AI 플랫폼이 보안 결함에 취약할 수 있음을 보았다. 딥시크도 예외는 아니다&#8221;고 그가 덧붙였다: &#8220;또한 사이버 공격의 위험은 항상 존재한다.&#8221;
지금 읽어보세요: 
<ul>
<li><a href="https://www.benzinga.com/economics/macro-economic-events/25/01/43247030/traders-want-the-fed-to-tame-market-volatility-yet-trump-powell-interest-rate-fight-is-just-beginning">트레이더들은 연준이 시장 변동성을 진정시키길 원하지만, 트럼프-파월 금리 인상 싸움은 이제 시작일 뿐입니다.</a></li>
</ul>
이미지: Shutterstock
Benzinga Pro의 독점 뉴스 및 도구로 더 많은 승리를 거두세요 
독점 속보 및 스캐너와 같은 Benzinga Pro의 강력한 도구 세트로 다른 트레이더보다 우위를 점하세요. 
<a href="https://www.benzinga.com/pro/register?t=be2bewe5mibe3bz3&amp;utm_source=bz-kor" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">여기를 클릭</a>하여 14일 무료 체험을 시작하세요.

엔비디아(NASDAQ:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/NVDA#NASDAQ">NVDA</a>)의 주식이 <a href="https://www.benzinga.com/news/24/10/41405213/nvidia-to-rally-around-39-here-are-10-top-analyst-forecasts-for-friday" target="_blank" rel="noopener" data-google-interstitial="false">금요일</a> 0.8% 상승하여 138달러로 마감하며 시가총액이 3조 달러를 넘었다. 그러나 낙관적인 전문가들에 따르면 주가는 더 상승할 수 있다.
전문가 의견: 루미다 웰스 매니지먼트(Lumida Wealth Management)의 CEO인 램 아루와리아(Ram Ahluwalia)는 이 회사의 가치가 4조 달러에 도달할 것이라고 낙관하고 있는 것으로 알려졌다.
"그것에 대해서는 의문의 여지가 없다. GPU 칩에 대한 수요가 강하고 얼리 어답터가 어느 정도 ROI를 얻기 시작하는 것을 볼 수 있다"고 아루와리아가 <a href="https://finance.yahoo.com/news/nvidia-to-win-the-race-to-4-trillion-market-cap-experts-say-131512935.html">야후 파이낸스</a>에 말했다.
T. 로우 프라이스(T. Rowe Price)의 포트폴리오 매니저 토니 왕(Tony Wang)도 이 자신감을 공유하고 있다.
나일스 인베스트먼트 매니지먼트(Niles Investment Management)의 설립자인 댄 나일스(Dan Niles)는 &#8220;인공지능(AI) 환경이 포화 상태에 도달하거나 더 성숙해지기 전에 몇 년 더 AI 투자를 해야 한다&#8221;고 말했다. &#8220;앞으로 몇 년 안에 엔비디아의 매출이 두 배로 증가할 것이고, 주식도 몇 년 안에 두 배로 상승할 것이라고 생각한다&#8221;고 나일스가 야후 파이낸스에 말했다.
"&#8230;모델 빌더(예: 오픈AI)가 높은 처리량과 짧은 대기 시간을 해결함에 따라 추론/인퍼런스(Inference) 컴퓨팅에 대한 수요가 기하급수적으로 증가할 수 있다. 중요한 것은 풀 스택 접근 방식의 지원을 받아 엔비디아가 인퍼런스에서 이러한 성장 기회를 포착할 수 있는 좋은 위치에 있다고 믿고 있다&#8221;고 파이낸셜 타임스가 <a href="https://www.ft.com/content/e910b9a2-ce6b-48b0-af45-0c55ca723395">골드만삭스</a>를 인용하여 보도했다. 골드만삭스는 주식 목표가를 150달러로 설정했다.
&#x2A;Note: 인퍼런스는 인공 지능(AI) 및 기계 학습(ML) 분야에서 훈련된 모델이 새로운 데이터에 대해 결론을 도출하는 과정을 말한다.
뱅크 오브 아메리카(Bofa) 증권은 금요일에 주식에 대한 &#8216;매수&#8217; 등급을 유지하고 이 회사의 목표 주가를 <a href="https://www.benzinga.com/analyst-ratings/analyst-color/24/10/41410262/ai-creates-generational-opportunity-why-nvidia-analyst-says-stock-will-hit-190">165달러에서 190달러로</a> 상향 조정했다.
실제로, 엔비디아는 38명의 애널리스트들의 평가를 바탕으로 <a href="https://www.benzinga.com/quote/NVDA/analyst-ratings">234.49달러의 컨센서스 목표 주가</a>를 가지고 있다.
중요성 (Why It Matters): <a href="https://pro.benzinga.com/dashboard">Benzinga Pro</a>의 데이터에 따르면, 엔비디아 주식은 연초 대비 거의 186.5% 상승했다. 현재 이 회사의 시가총액은 약 3.39조 달러이다.
<figure class="wp-block-image size-full"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" class="wp-image-603954" src="https://editorial-assets.benzinga.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/10/20002516/newplot-5-2-1.jpeg" sizes="(max-width: 650px) 100vw, 650px" srcset="https://editorial-assets.benzinga.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/10/20002516/newplot-5-2-1.jpeg 650w,https://editorial-assets.benzinga.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/10/20002516/newplot-5-2-1-300x208.jpeg 300w" alt="" width="650" height="450" /></figure>
현재 가치 평가 기준으로, 애플은 엔비디아보다 시가총액이 더 높은 유일한 미국 회사이다. 하지만 애플의 기업 가치마저도 4조 달러(3조 5,700억 달러)에 미치지 못한다.
<figure class="wp-block-image size-full"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" class="wp-image-603953" src="https://editorial-assets.benzinga.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/10/20002154/newplot-10-1.jpeg" sizes="(max-width: 650px) 100vw, 650px" srcset="https://editorial-assets.benzinga.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/10/20002154/newplot-10-1.jpeg 650w,https://editorial-assets.benzinga.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/10/20002154/newplot-10-1-300x208.jpeg 300w" alt="" width="650" height="450" /></figure>
엔비디아의 주가는 지난 한 해 동안 233% 이상 급등했으며, 주가는 41달러에서 138달러로 급등했다. 한편, 엔비디아를 추적하는 ETF들도 같은 기간 동안 최소 440%의 수익을 기록했다. 예를 들어 GraniteShares 2x Long NVDA Daily ETF(NASDAQ:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/NVDL#NASDAQ">NVDL</a>)와 Direxion Daily NVDA Bull 2X Shares (NASDAQ:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/NVDU#NASDAQ">NVDU</a>)가 있다.
더 읽어보기:
<ul>
<li><a href="https://www.benzinga.com/news/24/10/41417197/elon-musk-tesla-refute-inefficiency-concerns-with-wireless-charging-on-cybercab-there-is-no-meaningf">일론 머스크, 테슬라, 사이버택시의 무선 충전으로 비효율성 우려를 반박: &#8216;의미 있는 효율성 차이는 없다…&#8217;</a></li>
</ul>
이미지 출처: Shutterstock
Benzinga Pro의 독점 뉴스 및 도구로 더 많은 승리를 거두세요 
독점 속보 및 스캐너와 같은 Benzinga Pro의 강력한 도구 세트로 다른 트레이더보다 우위를 점하세요. 
<a href="https://www.benzinga.com/pro/register?t=be2bewe5mibe3bz3&amp;utm_source=bz-kor" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">여기를 클릭</a>하여 14일 무료 체험을 시작하세요.

Comments

Direxion Daily NVDA Bull 2X Shares

뉴스

에 대한 최신 뉴스 Direxion Daily NVDA Bull 2X Shares (NASDAQ:NVDU)

월요일, 1월 27, 2025

일요일, 10월 20, 2024

뉴스

파트너 / 기고자

벤징가 글로벌