Cloudflare Option Alert: Jan, 2027 $175 Calls Sweep (7) near the Ask: 501 vs 514 OI

Cloudflare Option Alert: Jan, 2027 $175 Calls Sweep (7) near the Ask: 501 @ $47.786 vs 514 OI; Ref=$165.83

Cloudflare Option Alert: Mar 21 $165 Puts at the Bid: 1000 vs 303 OI

Cloudflare Option Alert: Mar 21 $165 Puts at the Bid: 1000 @ $5.81 vs 303 OI; Ref=$173.535

Cloudflare (NYSE:NET) 주식

CLOUDFLARE INC - CLASS A

Cloudflare

Cloudflare is a software company based in San Francisco, California, that offers security and web performance offerings by utilizing a distributed, serverless content delivery network, or CDN. The firm's edge computing platform, Workers, leverages this network by providing clients the ability to deploy, and execute code without maintaining servers.

Konskie,,Poland,-,November,24,,2019:,Cloudflare,Inc,Logo,Displayed

Earnings

News

Guidance

After-Hours Center

Movers

Tech

클라우드플레어(NYSE:NET)는 목요일(8일) 장 마감 후 1분기 재무 실적을 발표했다. 다음은 실적 보고서의 요약 내용이다.1분기 매출: 4억 7,099만 달러, 예상치 4억 6,928만 달러 상회1분기 조정 주당순이익: 16센트, 예상치 17센트 하회

클라우드플레어, 역대 최대 계약 체결로 1분기 매출 호실적···시간외 주가 9% 급등

Side,View,Of,Concentrated,Crypto,Trader,Sitting,In,Front,Of

Equities

Long Ideas

Options

인터넷의 중추적인 역할을 담당하고 있음에도 불구하고, 클라우드플레어(NYSE:NET)는 올해의 시장 혼란에서 벗어나지 못했고, 주가는 광범위한 경제 불확실성의 영향을 받았다. 2월 고점에서 NET 주가는 4월 9일 저점까지 거의 50% 급락한 후 일부 손실을 회복했다. 그러나 지난 몇 주 동안, 스마트 머니는 조용히 포지션을 쌓고 있어, 시장 심리의 반전 가능성을 암시한다.

옵션 코너: 왜 스마트 머니가 클라우드플레어 실적 발표 전에 큰 가치를 예상하는가

Comments From Palantir’s CTO

Large Cap

Trading Ideas

AFRM

DOCS

EXPE

MPWR

PINS

PLTR

SMCI

SPOT

이들 10개 대형주는 지난주 최고의 성과를 거두었다. 그것들이 당신의 포트폴리오에 있나요? 1. 팔란티어 테크놀로지스(NASDAQ:PLTR)의 주식은 회사가 강력한 4분기 재무 결과를 발표한 후 34.38% 급등했다. 여러 애널리스트들도 목표 주가를 상향 조정했다.

팔란티어, 슈퍼 마이크로 컴퓨터 및 스포티파이 등 지난주 상승한 10개 대형주 (2월 3일-2월 7일)

Cloudflare Inc

NABORS ENERGY TRANSITION CORP COM

Nabors Energy Transition Corp. II - Class A Ordinary Shares

Nabors Energy Transition Corp II

Nabors Energy Transition Corp. II - Warrant

NETCOMPANY GROUP AS ADR by Netcompany Group AS

Netcompany Group AS

ENETI INC SHS

NETLease Corporate Real Estate ETF

NetLink NBN Trust

NETOBJECTS INC by NetObjects, Inc.

NetEase Inc

Network Media Group Inc

NETWORK MEDIA GROUP INC by Network Media Group Inc.

PacBio (NASDAQ:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/PACB#NASDAQ">PACB</a>) today announced that the Special Committee of its Board of Directors (the "Special Committee") has concluded its independent investigation into previously disclosed allegations from an attorney representing an employee impacted by our recent reduction in force regarding certain employment practices and cybersecurity matters of the Company. The allegations did not involve the current, or any previously reported, financial results, and the investigation found no improper employment practices and no material inaccuracies or omissions with respect to the cybersecurity disclosures in the Company's 2024 Form 10-K.

PACB

PacBio Independent Investigation Finds No Issues in Employment & Cybersecurity Matters

Arthur J. Gallagher (NYSE:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/AJG#NYSE">AJG</a>) has outperformed the market over the past 20 years by 4.89% on an annualized basis producing an average annual return of 13.11%. Currently, Arthur J. Gallagher has a market capitalization of $87.17 billion. 
Buying $100 In AJG: If an investor had bought $100 of AJG stock 20 years ago, it would be worth $1,184.20 today based on a price of $340.85 for AJG at the time of writing.
<h3>Arthur J. Gallagher's Performance Over Last 20 Years</h3>
<img src="https://www.benzinga.com/files/images/story/2025/1747062088_0.png" alt="comp_fig" />
Finally -- what's the point of all this? The key insight to take from this article is to note how much of a difference compounded returns can make in your cash growth over a period of time.
This article was generated by Benzinga's automated content engine and reviewed by an editor.

$100 Invested In This Stock 20 Years Ago Would Be Worth This Much Today

Scotiabank analyst Jonathan Goldman maintains Cascades (TSX:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/CAS#TSX">CAS</a>) with a Sector Outperform and lowers the price target from C$11.5 to C$10.

Price Target

Analyst Ratings

TSX:CAS

Scotiabank Maintains Sector Outperform on Cascades, Lowers Price Target to C$10

Morgan Stanley analyst Angel Castillo maintains Vulcan Materials (NYSE:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/VMC#NYSE">VMC</a>) with a Equal-Weight and raises the price target from $273 to $303.

Morgan Stanley Maintains Equal-Weight on Vulcan Materials, Raises Price Target to $303

In the dynamic and fiercely competitive business environment, conducting a thorough analysis of companies is crucial for investors and industry enthusiasts. In this article, we will perform an extensive industry comparison, evaluating Amazon.com (NASDAQ:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/AMZN#NASDAQ">AMZN</a>) in relation to its major competitors in the Broadline Retail industry. By closely examining crucial financial metrics, market position, and growth prospects, we aim to offer valuable insights for investors and shed light on company's performance within the industry.
<h3>Amazon.com Background</h3>
Amazon is the leading online retailer and marketplace for third party sellers. Retail related revenue represents approximately 75% of total, followed by Amazon Web Services' cloud computing, storage, database, and other offerings (15%), advertising services (5% to 10%), and other the remainder. International segments constitute 25% to 30% of Amazon's non-AWS sales, led by Germany, the United Kingdom, and Japan.
<table>
<thead>
<tr>
<th>Company</th>
<th>P/E</th>
<th>P/B</th>
<th>P/S</th>
<th>ROE</th>
<th>EBITDA (in billions)</th>
<th>Gross Profit (in billions)</th>
<th>Revenue Growth</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>Amazon.com Inc</td>
<td>31.44</td>
<td>6.70</td>
<td>3.19</td>
<td>5.79%</td>
<td>$36.48</td>
<td>$78.69</td>
<td>8.62%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Alibaba Group Holding Ltd</td>
<td>18.17</td>
<td>2.16</td>
<td>2.25</td>
<td>5.01%</td>
<td>$59.0</td>
<td>$117.63</td>
<td>7.61%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>PDD Holdings Inc</td>
<td>10.42</td>
<td>3.59</td>
<td>2.98</td>
<td>9.28%</td>
<td>$32.41</td>
<td>$62.81</td>
<td>24.45%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>MercadoLibre Inc</td>
<td>60.27</td>
<td>24.82</td>
<td>5.55</td>
<td>15.3%</td>
<td>$0.96</td>
<td>$2.75</td>
<td>37.42%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>JD.com Inc</td>
<td>9.11</td>
<td>1.48</td>
<td>0.32</td>
<td>4.21%</td>
<td>$12.54</td>
<td>$53.12</td>
<td>13.37%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Coupang Inc</td>
<td>185.71</td>
<td>10.80</td>
<td>1.53</td>
<td>2.53%</td>
<td>$0.36</td>
<td>$2.32</td>
<td>11.16%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>eBay Inc</td>
<td>16.71</td>
<td>6.47</td>
<td>3.30</td>
<td>9.95%</td>
<td>$0.77</td>
<td>$1.86</td>
<td>1.13%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Vipshop Holdings Ltd</td>
<td>6.96</td>
<td>1.29</td>
<td>0.50</td>
<td>6.31%</td>
<td>$3.29</td>
<td>$7.63</td>
<td>-4.18%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Ollie's Bargain Outlet Holdings Inc</td>
<td>32.87</td>
<td>3.85</td>
<td>2.89</td>
<td>4.14%</td>
<td>$0.1</td>
<td>$0.27</td>
<td>2.79%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>MINISO Group Holding Ltd</td>
<td>16.92</td>
<td>4.23</td>
<td>2.61</td>
<td>8.12%</td>
<td>$0.99</td>
<td>$2.22</td>
<td>22.68%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Dillard's Inc</td>
<td>9.78</td>
<td>3.15</td>
<td>0.88</td>
<td>11.4%</td>
<td>$0.31</td>
<td>$0.74</td>
<td>-4.97%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Nordstrom Inc</td>
<td>14.02</td>
<td>3.58</td>
<td>0.27</td>
<td>15.61%</td>
<td>$0.44</td>
<td>$1.69</td>
<td>-2.17%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Macy's Inc</td>
<td>5.61</td>
<td>0.71</td>
<td>0.14</td>
<td>7.86%</td>
<td>$0.68</td>
<td>$3.02</td>
<td>-4.39%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Savers Value Village Inc</td>
<td>78.86</td>
<td>4.20</td>
<td>1.18</td>
<td>-1.13%</td>
<td>$0.03</td>
<td>$0.2</td>
<td>4.51%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Kohl's Corp</td>
<td>6.85</td>
<td>0.20</td>
<td>0.05</td>
<td>1.26%</td>
<td>$0.31</td>
<td>$1.92</td>
<td>-9.39%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Hour Loop Inc</td>
<td>66</td>
<td>8.99</td>
<td>0.34</td>
<td>-25.78%</td>
<td>$-0.0</td>
<td>$0.02</td>
<td>-8.51%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Average</td>
<td>35.88</td>
<td>5.3</td>
<td>1.65</td>
<td>4.94%</td>
<td>$7.48</td>
<td>$17.21</td>
<td>6.1%</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<style>
 table {
 width: 100%;
 border-collapse: collapse;
 font-family: Arial, sans-serif;
 font-size: 14px;
 }

 th, td {
 padding: 8px;
 text-align: left;
 }

 th {
 background-color: #293a5a;
 color: #fff;
 text-align: left;
 }

 tr:nth-child(even) {
 background-color: #f2f4f8;
 }

 tr:hover {
 background-color: #e1e4ea;
 }

 td:nth-child(3), td:nth-child(5) {
 text-align: left;
 }

 .dividend-amount {
 font-weight: bold;
 color: #0d6efd;
 }

 .dividend-frequency {
 font-size: 12px;
 color: #6c757d;
 }
 </style>By conducting an in-depth analysis of Amazon.com, we can identify the following trends: 
<ul>
<li>
A Price to Earnings ratio of 31.44 significantly below the industry average by 0.88x suggests undervaluation. This can make the stock appealing for those seeking growth.
</li>
<li>
The elevated Price to Book ratio of 6.7 relative to the industry average by 1.26x suggests company might be overvalued based on its book value.
</li>
<li>
The stock's relatively high Price to Sales ratio of 3.19, surpassing the industry average by 1.93x, may indicate an aspect of overvaluation in terms of sales performance.
</li>
<li>
With a Return on Equity (ROE) of 5.79% that is 0.85% above the industry average, it appears that the company exhibits efficient use of equity to generate profits.
</li>
<li>
The Earnings Before Interest, Taxes, Depreciation, and Amortization (EBITDA) of $36.48 Billion is 4.88x above the industry average, highlighting stronger profitability and robust cash flow generation.
</li>
<li>
With higher gross profit of $78.69 Billion, which indicates 4.57x above the industry average, the company demonstrates stronger profitability and higher earnings from its core operations.
</li>
<li>
The company is experiencing remarkable revenue growth, with a rate of 8.62%, outperforming the industry average of 6.1%.
</li>
</ul>
<h3>Debt To Equity Ratio</h3>
<img src="https://www.benzinga.com/files/images/story/2025/1747062057_0.png" alt="debt to equity" />
The debt-to-equity (D/E) ratio is a measure that indicates the level of debt a company has taken on relative to the value of its assets net of liabilities.
Considering the debt-to-equity ratio in industry comparisons allows for a concise evaluation of a company's financial health and risk profile, aiding in informed decision-making.
When examining Amazon.com in comparison to its top 4 peers with respect to the Debt-to-Equity ratio, the following information becomes apparent:
<ul>
<li>
Amazon.com has a stronger financial position compared to its top 4 peers, as evidenced by its lower debt-to-equity ratio of 0.44.
</li>
<li>
This suggests that the company has a more favorable balance between debt and equity, which can be perceived as a positive indicator by investors.
</li>
</ul>
<h3>Key Takeaways</h3>
For Amazon.com in the Broadline Retail industry, the PE ratio is low compared to peers, indicating potential undervaluation. The PB and PS ratios are high, suggesting a premium valuation based on book value and sales. In terms of ROE, EBITDA, gross profit, and revenue growth, Amazon.com outperforms its industry peers, reflecting strong profitability and growth potential.
This article was generated by Benzinga's automated content engine and reviewed by an editor.

Markets

AMZN

Investigating Amazon.com's Standing In Broadline Retail Industry Compared To Competitors

In the ever-changing and fiercely competitive business landscape, conducting thorough company analysis is crucial for investors and industry experts. In this article, we will undertake a comprehensive industry comparison, evaluating Apple (NASDAQ:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/AAPL#NASDAQ">AAPL</a>) and its primary competitors in the Technology Hardware, Storage &amp; Peripherals industry. By closely examining key financial metrics, market position, and growth prospects, our aim is to provide valuable insights for investors and shed light on company's performance within the industry.
<h3>Apple Background</h3>
Apple is among the largest companies in the world, with a broad portfolio of hardware and software products targeted at consumers and businesses. Apple's iPhone makes up a majority of the firm sales, and Apple's other products like Mac, iPad, and Watch are designed around the iPhone as the focal point of an expansive software ecosystem. Apple has progressively worked to add new applications, like streaming video, subscription bundles, and augmented reality. The firm designs its own software and semiconductors while working with subcontractors like Foxconn and TSMC to build its products and chips. Slightly less than half of Apple's sales come directly through its flagship stores, with a majority of sales coming indirectly through partnerships and distribution.
<table>
<thead>
<tr>
<th>Company</th>
<th>P/E</th>
<th>P/B</th>
<th>P/S</th>
<th>ROE</th>
<th>EBITDA (in billions)</th>
<th>Gross Profit (in billions)</th>
<th>Revenue Growth</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>Apple Inc</td>
<td>30.92</td>
<td>44.39</td>
<td>7.54</td>
<td>37.11%</td>
<td>$32.25</td>
<td>$44.87</td>
<td>5.08%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Hewlett Packard Enterprise Co</td>
<td>8.12</td>
<td>0.88</td>
<td>0.74</td>
<td>2.39%</td>
<td>$1.11</td>
<td>$2.29</td>
<td>16.27%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Super Micro Computer Inc</td>
<td>17.41</td>
<td>2.99</td>
<td>0.93</td>
<td>1.72%</td>
<td>$0.4</td>
<td>$0.67</td>
<td>-18.99%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>NetApp Inc</td>
<td>17.31</td>
<td>19.38</td>
<td>3.03</td>
<td>31.69%</td>
<td>$0.45</td>
<td>$1.15</td>
<td>2.18%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Pure Storage Inc</td>
<td>157.10</td>
<td>12.19</td>
<td>5.27</td>
<td>3.12%</td>
<td>$0.09</td>
<td>$0.59</td>
<td>11.4%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Western Digital Corp</td>
<td>15.10</td>
<td>2.97</td>
<td>0.99</td>
<td>5.86%</td>
<td>$0.28</td>
<td>$0.91</td>
<td>30.94%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Eastman Kodak Co</td>
<td>5.99</td>
<td>0.68</td>
<td>0.48</td>
<td>2.46%</td>
<td>$0.05</td>
<td>$0.05</td>
<td>-3.27%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Turtle Beach Corp</td>
<td>13.74</td>
<td>1.79</td>
<td>0.60</td>
<td>18.11%</td>
<td>$0.03</td>
<td>$0.05</td>
<td>46.76%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Average</td>
<td>33.54</td>
<td>5.84</td>
<td>1.72</td>
<td>9.34%</td>
<td>$0.34</td>
<td>$0.82</td>
<td>12.18%</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<style>
 table {
 width: 100%;
 border-collapse: collapse;
 font-family: Arial, sans-serif;
 font-size: 14px;
 }

 th, td {
 padding: 8px;
 text-align: left;
 }

 th {
 background-color: #293a5a;
 color: #fff;
 text-align: left;
 }

 tr:nth-child(even) {
 background-color: #f2f4f8;
 }

 tr:hover {
 background-color: #e1e4ea;
 }

 td:nth-child(3), td:nth-child(5) {
 text-align: left;
 }

 .dividend-amount {
 font-weight: bold;
 color: #0d6efd;
 }

 .dividend-frequency {
 font-size: 12px;
 color: #6c757d;
 }
 </style>After a detailed analysis of Apple, the following trends become apparent: 
<ul>
<li>
The stock's Price to Earnings ratio of 30.92 is lower than the industry average by 0.92x, suggesting potential value in the eyes of market participants.
</li>
<li>
It could be trading at a premium in relation to its book value, as indicated by its Price to Book ratio of 44.39 which exceeds the industry average by 7.6x.
</li>
<li>
With a relatively high Price to Sales ratio of 7.54, which is 4.38x the industry average, the stock might be considered overvalued based on sales performance.
</li>
<li>
With a Return on Equity (ROE) of 37.11% that is 27.77% above the industry average, it appears that the company exhibits efficient use of equity to generate profits.
</li>
<li>
The Earnings Before Interest, Taxes, Depreciation, and Amortization (EBITDA) of $32.25 Billion is 94.85x above the industry average, highlighting stronger profitability and robust cash flow generation.
</li>
<li>
Compared to its industry, the company has higher gross profit of $44.87 Billion, which indicates 54.72x above the industry average, indicating stronger profitability and higher earnings from its core operations.
</li>
<li>
The company's revenue growth of 5.08% is significantly below the industry average of 12.18%. This suggests a potential struggle in generating increased sales volume.
</li>
</ul>
<h3>Debt To Equity Ratio</h3>
<img src="https://www.benzinga.com/files/images/story/2025/1747062048_0.png" alt="debt to equity" />
The debt-to-equity (D/E) ratio is a financial metric that helps determine the level of financial risk associated with a company's capital structure.
Considering the debt-to-equity ratio in industry comparisons allows for a concise evaluation of a company's financial health and risk profile, aiding in informed decision-making.
When assessing Apple against its top 4 peers using the Debt-to-Equity ratio, the following comparisons can be made:
<ul>
<li>
When evaluating the debt-to-equity ratio, Apple is in the middle position among its top 4 peers.
</li>
<li>
The company maintains a moderate level of debt relative to its equity with a debt-to-equity ratio of 1.47, suggesting a relatively balanced financial structure.
</li>
</ul>
<h3>Key Takeaways</h3>
For Apple in the Technology Hardware, Storage &amp; Peripherals industry, the PE, PB, and PS ratios indicate that the stock is relatively undervalued compared to its peers. However, the high ROE, EBITDA, gross profit, and low revenue growth suggest that Apple is efficiently utilizing its resources and generating strong profits, despite slower revenue growth. Overall, Apple's financial performance is solid, with room for potential growth in the future.
This article was generated by Benzinga's automated content engine and reviewed by an editor.

AAPL

Competitor Analysis: Evaluating Apple And Competitors In Technology Hardware, Storage &amp; Peripherals Industry

ARM Holdings's (NYSE:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/ARM#NYSE">ARM</a>) short percent of float has fallen 8.83% since its last report. The company recently reported that it has 15.09 million shares sold short, which is 11.77% of all regular shares that are available for trading. Based on its trading volume, it would take traders 3.91 days to cover their short positions on average.
<h3>Why Short Interest Matters</h3>
Short interest is the number of shares that have been sold short but have not yet been covered or closed out. <a href="https://www.benzinga.com/money/how-to-short-a-stock?adType=benzinga-insights&amp;ad=short-interest&amp;campaign=wallstreetadvantage">Short selling</a> is when a trader sells shares of a company they do not own, with the hope that the price will fall. Traders make money from short selling if the price of the stock falls and they lose if it rises.
Short interest is important to track because it can act as an indicator of market sentiment towards a particular stock. An increase in short interest can signal that investors have become more bearish, while a decrease in short interest can signal they have become more bullish.
See Also: <a href="https://www.benzinga.com/short-interest?adType=benzinga-insights&amp;ad=short-interest&amp;campaign=wallstreetadvantage">List of the most shorted stocks</a>
<h3>ARM Holdings Short Interest Graph (3 Months)</h3>
<img src="https://www.benzinga.com/files/images/story/2025/1747062041_0.png" alt="short_fig" />
As you can see from the chart above the percentage of shares that are sold short for ARM Holdings has declined since its last report. This does not mean that the stock is going to rise in the near-term but traders should be aware that less shares are being shorted.
<h3>Comparing ARM Holdings's Short Interest Against Its Peers</h3>
Peer comparison is a popular technique amongst analysts and investors for gauging how well a company is performing. A company's peer is another company that has similar characteristics to it, such as industry, size, age, and financial structure. You can find a company's peer group by reading its 10-K, proxy filing, or by doing your own similarity analysis.
According to <a href="https://www.benzinga.com/pro/">Benzinga Pro</a>, ARM Holdings's peer group average for short interest as a percentage of float is 5.03%, which means the company has more short interest than most of its peers.
Did you know that increasing short interest can actually be bullish for a stock? <a href="https://www.benzinga.com/money/how-to-make-money-on-a-short-squeeze?adType=benzinga-insights&amp;ad=short-interest&amp;campaign=wallstreetadvantage">This post by Benzinga Money explains how you can profit from it.</a>
This article was generated by Benzinga's automated content engine and was reviewed by an editor.

Short Sellers

Short Ideas

Peering Into ARM Holdings's Recent Short Interest

In the dynamic and cutthroat world of business, conducting thorough company analysis is essential for investors and industry experts. In this article, we will undertake a comprehensive industry comparison, evaluating Meta Platforms (NASDAQ:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/META#NASDAQ">META</a>) and its primary competitors in the Interactive Media &amp; Services industry. By closely examining key financial metrics, market position, and growth prospects, our aim is to provide valuable insights for investors and shed light on company's performance within the industry.
<h3>Meta Platforms Background</h3>
Meta is the largest social media company in the world, boasting close to 4 billion monthly active users worldwide. The firm's "Family of Apps," its core business, consists of Facebook, Instagram, Messenger, and WhatsApp. End users can leverage these applications for a variety of different purposes, from keeping in touch with friends to following celebrities and running digital businesses for free. Meta packages customer data, gleaned from its application ecosystem and sells ads to digital advertisers. While the firm has been investing heavily in its Reality Labs business, it remains a very small part of Meta's overall sales.
<table>
<thead>
<tr>
<th>Company</th>
<th>P/E</th>
<th>P/B</th>
<th>P/S</th>
<th>ROE</th>
<th>EBITDA (in billions)</th>
<th>Gross Profit (in billions)</th>
<th>Revenue Growth</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>Meta Platforms Inc</td>
<td>23.16</td>
<td>8.05</td>
<td>9.06</td>
<td>9.05%</td>
<td>$22.52</td>
<td>$34.74</td>
<td>16.07%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Alphabet Inc</td>
<td>17.05</td>
<td>5.37</td>
<td>5.21</td>
<td>10.3%</td>
<td>$46.31</td>
<td>$53.87</td>
<td>12.04%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Baidu Inc</td>
<td>9.52</td>
<td>0.82</td>
<td>1.65</td>
<td>1.76%</td>
<td>$7.22</td>
<td>$16.11</td>
<td>-2.37%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Reddit Inc</td>
<td>21.74</td>
<td>9.03</td>
<td>13.34</td>
<td>1.2%</td>
<td>$0.01</td>
<td>$0.36</td>
<td>61.49%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Pinterest Inc</td>
<td>10.74</td>
<td>4.22</td>
<td>5.45</td>
<td>0.19%</td>
<td>$-0.03</td>
<td>$0.66</td>
<td>15.54%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Kanzhun Ltd</td>
<td>33.03</td>
<td>3.41</td>
<td>7.10</td>
<td>3.05%</td>
<td>$0.38</td>
<td>$1.51</td>
<td>15.4%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>ZoomInfo Technologies Inc</td>
<td>116.88</td>
<td>1.87</td>
<td>2.79</td>
<td>0.87%</td>
<td>$0.02</td>
<td>$0.26</td>
<td>-2.31%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>CarGurus Inc</td>
<td>84</td>
<td>7.64</td>
<td>3.62</td>
<td>8.27%</td>
<td>$0.05</td>
<td>$0.2</td>
<td>4.34%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Autohome Inc</td>
<td>13.65</td>
<td>0.90</td>
<td>3.14</td>
<td>1.25%</td>
<td>$0.23</td>
<td>$1.35</td>
<td>-6.7%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Yelp Inc</td>
<td>19.11</td>
<td>3.45</td>
<td>1.88</td>
<td>3.31%</td>
<td>$0.07</td>
<td>$0.33</td>
<td>-0.94%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Weibo Corp</td>
<td>7.36</td>
<td>0.60</td>
<td>1.29</td>
<td>0.25%</td>
<td>$0.14</td>
<td>$0.36</td>
<td>-1.48%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Tripadvisor Inc</td>
<td>38.51</td>
<td>2.76</td>
<td>1.19</td>
<td>-1.39%</td>
<td>$0.01</td>
<td>$0.37</td>
<td>0.76%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Ziff Davis Inc</td>
<td>17.66</td>
<td>0.73</td>
<td>0.96</td>
<td>3.6%</td>
<td>$0.14</td>
<td>$0.37</td>
<td>5.88%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Yalla Group Ltd</td>
<td>9.73</td>
<td>1.61</td>
<td>3.88</td>
<td>4.72%</td>
<td>$0.03</td>
<td>$0.06</td>
<td>12.24%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Taboola.com Ltd</td>
<td>83.50</td>
<td>1.19</td>
<td>0.64</td>
<td>-0.85%</td>
<td>$0.01</td>
<td>$0.12</td>
<td>3.26%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Average</td>
<td>34.46</td>
<td>3.11</td>
<td>3.72</td>
<td>2.61%</td>
<td>$3.9</td>
<td>$5.42</td>
<td>8.37%</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<style>
 table {
 width: 100%;
 border-collapse: collapse;
 font-family: Arial, sans-serif;
 font-size: 14px;
 }

 th, td {
 padding: 8px;
 text-align: left;
 }

 th {
 background-color: #293a5a;
 color: #fff;
 text-align: left;
 }

 tr:nth-child(even) {
 background-color: #f2f4f8;
 }

 tr:hover {
 background-color: #e1e4ea;
 }

 td:nth-child(3), td:nth-child(5) {
 text-align: left;
 }

 .dividend-amount {
 font-weight: bold;
 color: #0d6efd;
 }

 .dividend-frequency {
 font-size: 12px;
 color: #6c757d;
 }
 </style>When analyzing Meta Platforms, the following trends become evident: 
<ul>
<li>
With a Price to Earnings ratio of 23.16, which is 0.67x less than the industry average, the stock shows potential for growth at a reasonable price, making it an interesting consideration for market participants.
</li>
<li>
The elevated Price to Book ratio of 8.05 relative to the industry average by 2.59x suggests company might be overvalued based on its book value.
</li>
<li>
With a relatively high Price to Sales ratio of 9.06, which is 2.44x the industry average, the stock might be considered overvalued based on sales performance.
</li>
<li>
The company has a higher Return on Equity (ROE) of 9.05%, which is 6.44% above the industry average. This suggests efficient use of equity to generate profits and demonstrates profitability and growth potential.
</li>
<li>
The company has higher Earnings Before Interest, Taxes, Depreciation, and Amortization (EBITDA) of $22.52 Billion, which is 5.77x above the industry average, indicating stronger profitability and robust cash flow generation.
</li>
<li>
With higher gross profit of $34.74 Billion, which indicates 6.41x above the industry average, the company demonstrates stronger profitability and higher earnings from its core operations.
</li>
<li>
The company is experiencing remarkable revenue growth, with a rate of 16.07%, outperforming the industry average of 8.37%.
</li>
</ul>
<h3>Debt To Equity Ratio</h3>
<img src="https://www.benzinga.com/files/images/story/2025/1747062039_0.png" alt="debt to equity" />
The debt-to-equity (D/E) ratio is an important measure to assess the financial structure and risk profile of a company.
Considering the debt-to-equity ratio in industry comparisons allows for a concise evaluation of a company's financial health and risk profile, aiding in informed decision-making.
In terms of the Debt-to-Equity ratio, Meta Platforms stands in comparison with its top 4 peers, leading to the following comparisons:
<ul>
<li>
In terms of the debt-to-equity ratio, Meta Platforms has a lower level of debt compared to its top 4 peers, indicating a stronger financial position.
</li>
<li>
This implies that the company relies less on debt financing and has a more favorable balance between debt and equity with a lower debt-to-equity ratio of 0.27.
</li>
</ul>
<h3>Key Takeaways</h3>
The PE, PB, and PS ratios for Meta Platforms indicate that it may be overvalued compared to its peers in the Interactive Media &amp; Services industry. However, its high ROE, EBITDA, gross profit, and revenue growth suggest strong financial performance relative to industry standards. This suggests that while the stock may be trading at a premium based on traditional valuation metrics, its operational efficiency and growth potential are favorable.
This article was generated by Benzinga's automated content engine and reviewed by an editor.

Understanding Meta Platforms's Position In Interactive Media &amp; Services Industry Compared To Competitors

Entergy's (NYSE:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/ETR#NYSE">ETR</a>) short percent of float has fallen 13.58% since its last report. The company recently reported that it has 9.87 million shares sold short, which is 2.61% of all regular shares that are available for trading. Based on its trading volume, it would take traders 2.96 days to cover their short positions on average.
<h3>Why Short Interest Matters</h3>
Short interest is the number of shares that have been sold short but have not yet been covered or closed out. <a href="https://www.benzinga.com/money/how-to-short-a-stock?adType=benzinga-insights&amp;ad=short-interest&amp;campaign=wallstreetadvantage">Short selling</a> is when a trader sells shares of a company they do not own, with the hope that the price will fall. Traders make money from short selling if the price of the stock falls and they lose if it rises.
Short interest is important to track because it can act as an indicator of market sentiment towards a particular stock. An increase in short interest can signal that investors have become more bearish, while a decrease in short interest can signal they have become more bullish.
See Also: <a href="https://www.benzinga.com/short-interest?adType=benzinga-insights&amp;ad=short-interest&amp;campaign=wallstreetadvantage">List of the most shorted stocks</a>
<h3>Entergy Short Interest Graph (3 Months)</h3>
<img src="https://www.benzinga.com/files/images/story/2025/1747062036_0.png" alt="short_fig" />
As you can see from the chart above the percentage of shares that are sold short for Entergy has declined since its last report. This does not mean that the stock is going to rise in the near-term but traders should be aware that less shares are being shorted.
<h3>Comparing Entergy's Short Interest Against Its Peers</h3>
Peer comparison is a popular technique amongst analysts and investors for gauging how well a company is performing. A company's peer is another company that has similar characteristics to it, such as industry, size, age, and financial structure. You can find a company's peer group by reading its 10-K, proxy filing, or by doing your own similarity analysis.
According to <a href="https://www.benzinga.com/pro/">Benzinga Pro</a>, Entergy's peer group average for short interest as a percentage of float is 2.46%, which means the company has more short interest than most of its peers.
Did you know that increasing short interest can actually be bullish for a stock? <a href="https://www.benzinga.com/money/how-to-make-money-on-a-short-squeeze?adType=benzinga-insights&amp;ad=short-interest&amp;campaign=wallstreetadvantage">This post by Benzinga Money explains how you can profit from it.</a>
This article was generated by Benzinga's automated content engine and was reviewed by an editor.

Peering Into Entergy's Recent Short Interest

In the current session, the stock is trading at $185.08, after a 5.90% increase. Over the past month, Powell Industries Inc. (NASDAQ:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/POWL#NASDAQ">POWL</a>) stock increased by 6.79%, and in the past year, by 16.34%. With performance like this, long-term shareholders are optimistic but others are more likely to look into the price-to-earnings ratio to see if the stock might be overvalued.

<img src="https://www.benzinga.com/files/images/story/2025/1747062033_0.png" alt="Past Year Chart" />

<h3>Evaluating Powell Industries P/E in Comparison to Its Peers</h3>
The P/E ratio is used by long-term shareholders to assess the company's market performance against aggregate market data, historical earnings, and the industry at large. A lower P/E could indicate that shareholders do not expect the stock to perform better in the future or it could mean that the company is undervalued. 
Powell Industries has a lower P/E than the aggregate P/E of 42.63 of the Electrical Equipment industry. Ideally, one might believe that the stock might perform worse than its peers, but it's also probable that the stock is undervalued. 

<img src="https://www.benzinga.com/files/images/story/2025/1747062033_1.png" alt="Guage" />

In conclusion, the price-to-earnings ratio is a useful metric for analyzing a company's market performance, but it has its limitations. While a lower P/E can indicate that a company is undervalued, it can also suggest that shareholders do not expect future growth. Additionally, the P/E ratio should not be used in isolation, as other factors such as industry trends and business cycles can also impact a company's stock price. Therefore, investors should use the P/E ratio in conjunction with other financial metrics and qualitative analysis to make informed investment decisions.

Intraday Update

POWL

Price Over Earnings Overview: Powell Industries

McKesson's (NYSE:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/MCK#NYSE">MCK</a>) short percent of float has risen 14.47% since its last report. The company recently reported that it has 2.17 million shares sold short, which is 1.74% of all regular shares that are available for trading. Based on its trading volume, it would take traders 2.59 days to cover their short positions on average.
<h3>Why Short Interest Matters</h3>
Short interest is the number of shares that have been sold short but have not yet been covered or closed out. <a href="https://www.benzinga.com/money/how-to-short-a-stock?adType=benzinga-insights&amp;ad=short-interest&amp;campaign=wallstreetadvantage">Short selling</a> is when a trader sells shares of a company they do not own, with the hope that the price will fall. Traders make money from short selling if the price of the stock falls and they lose if it rises.
Short interest is important to track because it can act as an indicator of market sentiment towards a particular stock. An increase in short interest can signal that investors have become more bearish, while a decrease in short interest can signal they have become more bullish.
See Also: <a href="https://www.benzinga.com/short-interest?adType=benzinga-insights&amp;ad=short-interest&amp;campaign=wallstreetadvantage">List of the most shorted stocks</a>
<h3>McKesson Short Interest Graph (3 Months)</h3>
<img src="https://www.benzinga.com/files/images/story/2025/1747062031_0.png" alt="short_fig" />
As you can see from the chart above the percentage of shares that are sold short for McKesson has grown since its last report. This does not mean that the stock is going to fall in the near-term but traders should be aware that more shares are being shorted.
<h3>Comparing McKesson's Short Interest Against Its Peers</h3>
Peer comparison is a popular technique amongst analysts and investors for gauging how well a company is performing. A company's peer is another company that has similar characteristics to it, such as industry, size, age, and financial structure. You can find a company's peer group by reading its 10-K, proxy filing, or by doing your own similarity analysis.
According to <a href="https://www.benzinga.com/pro/">Benzinga Pro</a>, McKesson's peer group average for short interest as a percentage of float is 4.59%, which means the company has less short interest than most of its peers.
Did you know that increasing short interest can actually be bullish for a stock? <a href="https://www.benzinga.com/money/how-to-make-money-on-a-short-squeeze?adType=benzinga-insights&amp;ad=short-interest&amp;campaign=wallstreetadvantage">This post by Benzinga Money explains how you can profit from it.</a>
This article was generated by Benzinga's automated content engine and was reviewed by an editor.

What Does the Market Think About McKesson?

In the fast-paced and cutthroat world of business, conducting thorough company analysis is essential for investors and industry experts. In this article, we will undertake a comprehensive industry comparison, evaluating Microsoft (NASDAQ:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/MSFT#NASDAQ">MSFT</a>) in comparison to its major competitors within the Software industry. By analyzing crucial financial metrics, market position, and growth potential, our objective is to provide valuable insights for investors and offer a deeper understanding of company's performance in the industry.
<h3>Microsoft Background</h3>
Microsoft develops and licenses consumer and enterprise software. It is known for its Windows operating systems and Office productivity suite. The company is organized into three equally sized broad segments: productivity and business processes (legacy Microsoft Office, cloud-based Office 365, Exchange, SharePoint, Skype, LinkedIn, Dynamics), intelligence cloud (infrastructure- and platform-as-a-service offerings Azure, Windows Server OS, SQL Server), and more personal computing (Windows Client, Xbox, Bing search, display advertising, and Surface laptops, tablets, and desktops).
<table>
<thead>
<tr>
<th>Company</th>
<th>P/E</th>
<th>P/B</th>
<th>P/S</th>
<th>ROE</th>
<th>EBITDA (in billions)</th>
<th>Gross Profit (in billions)</th>
<th>Revenue Growth</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>Microsoft Corp</td>
<td>33.90</td>
<td>10.13</td>
<td>12.13</td>
<td>8.27%</td>
<td>$40.71</td>
<td>$48.15</td>
<td>13.27%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Oracle Corp</td>
<td>35.29</td>
<td>25.20</td>
<td>7.70</td>
<td>19.27%</td>
<td>$5.89</td>
<td>$9.94</td>
<td>6.4%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>ServiceNow Inc</td>
<td>132.98</td>
<td>20.01</td>
<td>17.85</td>
<td>4.66%</td>
<td>$0.72</td>
<td>$2.44</td>
<td>18.63%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Palo Alto Networks Inc</td>
<td>105.61</td>
<td>19.41</td>
<td>15.46</td>
<td>4.35%</td>
<td>$0.41</td>
<td>$1.66</td>
<td>14.29%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Fortinet Inc</td>
<td>40.09</td>
<td>37.99</td>
<td>12.27</td>
<td>25.08%</td>
<td>$0.56</td>
<td>$1.25</td>
<td>13.77%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Gen Digital Inc</td>
<td>28.07</td>
<td>7.85</td>
<td>4.58</td>
<td>6.43%</td>
<td>$0.45</td>
<td>$0.79</td>
<td>2.43%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Monday.Com Ltd</td>
<td>448.77</td>
<td>13.71</td>
<td>15.01</td>
<td>2.3%</td>
<td>$0.07</td>
<td>$0.24</td>
<td>32.29%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>CommVault Systems Inc</td>
<td>101.55</td>
<td>23.15</td>
<td>7.74</td>
<td>10.11%</td>
<td>$0.03</td>
<td>$0.23</td>
<td>23.17%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Dolby Laboratories Inc</td>
<td>28.54</td>
<td>2.81</td>
<td>5.56</td>
<td>3.61%</td>
<td>$0.14</td>
<td>$0.33</td>
<td>1.38%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Qualys Inc</td>
<td>27.06</td>
<td>9.65</td>
<td>7.90</td>
<td>9.75%</td>
<td>$0.06</td>
<td>$0.13</td>
<td>9.67%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Progress Software Corp</td>
<td>47.95</td>
<td>6.07</td>
<td>3.35</td>
<td>2.51%</td>
<td>$0.07</td>
<td>$0.19</td>
<td>28.88%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Teradata Corp</td>
<td>15.94</td>
<td>13.60</td>
<td>1.29</td>
<td>30.24%</td>
<td>$0.09</td>
<td>$0.25</td>
<td>-10.11%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Rapid7 Inc</td>
<td>62.85</td>
<td>91.19</td>
<td>1.88</td>
<td>-25.97%</td>
<td>$0.02</td>
<td>$0.15</td>
<td>5.36%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>N-able Inc</td>
<td>94</td>
<td>1.83</td>
<td>3.02</td>
<td>-0.93%</td>
<td>$0.01</td>
<td>$0.09</td>
<td>3.91%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Average</td>
<td>89.9</td>
<td>20.96</td>
<td>7.97</td>
<td>7.03%</td>
<td>$0.66</td>
<td>$1.36</td>
<td>11.54%</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<style>
 table {
 width: 100%;
 border-collapse: collapse;
 font-family: Arial, sans-serif;
 font-size: 14px;
 }

 th, td {
 padding: 8px;
 text-align: left;
 }

 th {
 background-color: #293a5a;
 color: #fff;
 text-align: left;
 }

 tr:nth-child(even) {
 background-color: #f2f4f8;
 }

 tr:hover {
 background-color: #e1e4ea;
 }

 td:nth-child(3), td:nth-child(5) {
 text-align: left;
 }

 .dividend-amount {
 font-weight: bold;
 color: #0d6efd;
 }

 .dividend-frequency {
 font-size: 12px;
 color: #6c757d;
 }
 </style>Upon closer analysis of Microsoft, the following trends become apparent: 
<ul>
<li>
A Price to Earnings ratio of 33.9 significantly below the industry average by 0.38x suggests undervaluation. This can make the stock appealing for those seeking growth.
</li>
<li>
The current Price to Book ratio of 10.13, which is 0.48x the industry average, is substantially lower than the industry average, indicating potential undervaluation.
</li>
<li>
The Price to Sales ratio of 12.13, which is 1.52x the industry average, suggests the stock could potentially be overvalued in relation to its sales performance compared to its peers.
</li>
<li>
The company has a higher Return on Equity (ROE) of 8.27%, which is 1.24% above the industry average. This suggests efficient use of equity to generate profits and demonstrates profitability and growth potential.
</li>
<li>
With higher Earnings Before Interest, Taxes, Depreciation, and Amortization (EBITDA) of $40.71 Billion, which is 61.68x above the industry average, the company demonstrates stronger profitability and robust cash flow generation.
</li>
<li>
With higher gross profit of $48.15 Billion, which indicates 35.4x above the industry average, the company demonstrates stronger profitability and higher earnings from its core operations.
</li>
<li>
The company's revenue growth of 13.27% is notably higher compared to the industry average of 11.54%, showcasing exceptional sales performance and strong demand for its products or services.
</li>
</ul>
<h3>Debt To Equity Ratio</h3>
<img src="https://www.benzinga.com/files/images/story/2025/1747062029_0.png" alt="debt to equity" />
The debt-to-equity (D/E) ratio is an important measure to assess the financial structure and risk profile of a company.
Considering the debt-to-equity ratio in industry comparisons allows for a concise evaluation of a company's financial health and risk profile, aiding in informed decision-making.
In light of the Debt-to-Equity ratio, a comparison between Microsoft and its top 4 peers reveals the following information:
<ul>
<li>
When considering the debt-to-equity ratio, Microsoft exhibits a stronger financial position compared to its top 4 peers.
</li>
<li>
This indicates that the company has a favorable balance between debt and equity, with a lower debt-to-equity ratio of 0.19, which can be perceived as a positive aspect by investors.
</li>
</ul>
<h3>Key Takeaways</h3>
For Microsoft in the Software industry, the PE and PB ratios suggest the company is undervalued compared to its peers, indicating potential for growth. However, the high PS ratio implies that the stock may be overvalued based on its revenue. On the other hand, Microsoft's high ROE, EBITDA, gross profit, and revenue growth rates indicate strong financial performance and growth potential within the industry sector.
This article was generated by Benzinga's automated content engine and reviewed by an editor.

MSFT

Evaluating Microsoft Against Peers In Software Industry

It was revealed in a recent SEC filing that Carrie M Fox, Director at Civitas Resources (NYSE:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/CIVI#NYSE">CIVI</a>) made a noteworthy insider purchase on May 12,.
What Happened: A Form 4 filing with the <a href="https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/0001509589/000184083825000003//Archives/edgar/data/1509589/000184083825000003/0001840838-25-000003-index.htm">U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission</a> on Monday unveiled that Fox made a notable purchase of 18,076 shares of Civitas Resources, valuing at $501,055.
Monitoring the market, Civitas Resources's shares up by 8.46% at $30.0 during Monday's morning.
<h3>All You Need to Know About Civitas Resources</h3>
Civitas Resources Inc is an independent exploration and production company engaged in the acquisition, development, and production of oil and associated liquids-rich natural gas in the Rocky Mountain region, in the Denver-Julesburg Basin of Colorado - DJ Basin. The company's operations are focused on developing the horizontal Niobrara and Codell formations that have a low-cost structure, mature infrastructure, production efficiencies, multiple producing horizons, multiple service providers, established reserves, and prospective drilling opportunities.
<h3>Civitas Resources's Economic Impact: An Analysis</h3>
Revenue Growth: Civitas Resources's revenue growth over a period of 3 months has faced challenges. As of 31 March, 2025, the company experienced a revenue decline of approximately -7.72%. This indicates a decrease in the company's top-line earnings. In comparison to its industry peers, the company trails behind with a growth rate lower than the average among peers in the Energy sector.
Profitability Metrics:
<ul>
<li>
Gross Margin: The company shows a low gross margin of 39.6%, indicating concerns regarding cost management and overall profitability relative to its industry counterparts.
</li>
<li>
Earnings per Share (EPS): The company excels with an EPS that surpasses the industry average. With a current EPS of 1.99, Civitas Resources showcases strong earnings per share.
</li>
</ul>
Debt Management: With a high debt-to-equity ratio of 0.76, Civitas Resources faces challenges in effectively managing its debt levels, indicating potential financial strain.
Financial Valuation Breakdown:
<ul>
<li>
Price to Earnings (P/E) Ratio: With a lower-than-average P/E ratio of 3.18, the stock indicates an attractive valuation, potentially presenting a buying opportunity.
</li>
<li>
Price to Sales (P/S) Ratio: The current P/S ratio of 0.53 is below industry norms, suggesting potential undervaluation and presenting an investment opportunity for those considering sales performance.
</li>
<li>
EV/EBITDA Analysis (Enterprise Value to its Earnings Before Interest, Taxes, Depreciation &amp; Amortization): With an EV/EBITDA ratio lower than industry benchmarks at 2.15, Civitas Resources presents an attractive value opportunity.
</li>
</ul>
Market Capitalization: Indicating a reduced size compared to industry averages, the company's market capitalization poses unique challenges.
<a href="https://www.schwab.com/brokerage?aff=XEC">Now trade stocks online commission free with Charles Schwab, a trusted and complete investment firm.</a>
<h3>The Impact of Insider Transactions on Investments</h3>
Insider transactions serve as a piece of the puzzle in investment decisions, rather than the entire picture.
When discussing legal matters, the term "insider" refers to any officer, director, or beneficial owner holding more than ten percent of a company's equity securities, as stipulated in Section 12 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. This includes executives in the c-suite and significant hedge funds. Such insiders are required to report their transactions through a Form 4 filing, which must be completed within two business days of the transaction.
A new purchase by a company insider is a indication that they anticipate the stock will rise.
On the other hand, insider sells may not necessarily indicate a bearish view and can be motivated by various factors.
<h3>Essential Transaction Codes Unveiled</h3>
For <a href="https://www.benzinga.com/money/investing-tools">investors</a>, a primary focus lies on transactions occurring in the open market, as indicated in Table I of the Form 4 filing. A P in Box 3 denotes a purchase, while S signifies a sale. Transaction code C signals the conversion of an option, and transaction code A denotes a grant, award, or other acquisition of securities from the company.
<a href="https://www.benzinga.com/sec/insider-trades/search/index?company_cik=0001509589">Check Out The Full List Of Civitas Resources's Insider Trades.</a>
Insider Buying Alert: Profit from C-Suite Moves
Benzinga Edge reveals every insider trade in real-time. Don't miss the next big stock move driven by insider confidence. Unlock this ultimate sentiment indicator now. <a href="https://www.benzinga.com/premium/ideas/benzinga-edge-checkout/?t=Be8be9arja3be22in8&amp;adType=benzinga-insights&amp;ad=analyst-ratings&amp;campaign=wallstreetadvantage">Click here for access</a>.
This article was generated by Benzinga's automated content engine and reviewed by an editor.

Insider Trades

CIVI

Carrie M Fox's Recent Buy: Acquires $501K In Civitas Resources Stock

In today's rapidly evolving and fiercely competitive business landscape, it is crucial for investors and industry analysts to conduct comprehensive company evaluations. In this article, we will undertake an in-depth industry comparison, assessing NVIDIA (NASDAQ:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/NVDA#NASDAQ">NVDA</a>) alongside its primary competitors in the Semiconductors &amp; Semiconductor Equipment industry. By meticulously examining crucial financial indicators, market positioning, and growth potential, we aim to provide valuable insights to investors and shed light on company's performance within the industry.
<h3>NVIDIA Background</h3>
Nvidia is a leading developer of graphics processing units. Traditionally, GPUs were used to enhance the experience on computing platforms, most notably in gaming applications on PCs. GPU use cases have since emerged as important semiconductors used in artificial intelligence. Nvidia not only offers AI GPUs, but also a software platform, Cuda, used for AI model development and training. Nvidia is also expanding its data center networking solutions, helping to tie GPUs together to handle complex workloads.
<table>
<thead>
<tr>
<th>Company</th>
<th>P/E</th>
<th>P/B</th>
<th>P/S</th>
<th>ROE</th>
<th>EBITDA (in billions)</th>
<th>Gross Profit (in billions)</th>
<th>Revenue Growth</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>NVIDIA Corp</td>
<td>39.68</td>
<td>35.88</td>
<td>22.17</td>
<td>30.42%</td>
<td>$25.82</td>
<td>$28.72</td>
<td>77.94%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Broadcom Inc</td>
<td>96.39</td>
<td>14.03</td>
<td>18.41</td>
<td>8.01%</td>
<td>$8.54</td>
<td>$10.14</td>
<td>24.71%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Advanced Micro Devices Inc</td>
<td>75.07</td>
<td>2.88</td>
<td>6.05</td>
<td>1.23%</td>
<td>$1.59</td>
<td>$3.74</td>
<td>35.9%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Qualcomm Inc</td>
<td>14.81</td>
<td>5.75</td>
<td>3.86</td>
<td>10.3%</td>
<td>$3.67</td>
<td>$6.04</td>
<td>16.93%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Texas Instruments Inc</td>
<td>32.63</td>
<td>9.54</td>
<td>9.86</td>
<td>7.08%</td>
<td>$1.85</td>
<td>$2.31</td>
<td>11.14%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>ARM Holdings PLC</td>
<td>154.40</td>
<td>17.85</td>
<td>30.72</td>
<td>3.17%</td>
<td>$0.22</td>
<td>$0.95</td>
<td>26.25%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Analog Devices Inc</td>
<td>66.30</td>
<td>2.93</td>
<td>11.08</td>
<td>1.11%</td>
<td>$1.03</td>
<td>$1.43</td>
<td>-3.56%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Micron Technology Inc</td>
<td>20.54</td>
<td>1.97</td>
<td>3.09</td>
<td>3.32%</td>
<td>$3.95</td>
<td>$2.96</td>
<td>38.27%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Monolithic Power Systems Inc</td>
<td>17.01</td>
<td>9.35</td>
<td>12.99</td>
<td>4.17%</td>
<td>$0.18</td>
<td>$0.35</td>
<td>39.24%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>STMicroelectronics NV</td>
<td>20.28</td>
<td>1.21</td>
<td>1.82</td>
<td>0.32%</td>
<td>$0.51</td>
<td>$0.84</td>
<td>-27.36%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>ASE Technology Holding Co Ltd</td>
<td>18.61</td>
<td>1.96</td>
<td>1.02</td>
<td>2.39%</td>
<td>$27.16</td>
<td>$24.89</td>
<td>11.56%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>United Microelectronics Corp</td>
<td>12.15</td>
<td>1.46</td>
<td>2.38</td>
<td>2.06%</td>
<td>$23.86</td>
<td>$15.45</td>
<td>5.91%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>ON Semiconductor Corp</td>
<td>28.46</td>
<td>2.13</td>
<td>2.64</td>
<td>-5.78%</td>
<td>$-0.37</td>
<td>$0.29</td>
<td>-22.39%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>First Solar Inc</td>
<td>11.95</td>
<td>1.84</td>
<td>3.55</td>
<td>2.59%</td>
<td>$0.35</td>
<td>$0.34</td>
<td>6.35%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Skyworks Solutions Inc</td>
<td>26.64</td>
<td>1.76</td>
<td>2.78</td>
<td>1.11%</td>
<td>$0.22</td>
<td>$0.39</td>
<td>-8.87%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Credo Technology Group Holding Ltd</td>
<td>1693.33</td>
<td>13.95</td>
<td>27.36</td>
<td>4.95%</td>
<td>$0.03</td>
<td>$0.09</td>
<td>154.44%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Universal Display Corp</td>
<td>29.92</td>
<td>4.12</td>
<td>10.57</td>
<td>3.93%</td>
<td>$0.08</td>
<td>$0.13</td>
<td>0.62%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Qorvo Inc</td>
<td>126.19</td>
<td>2.02</td>
<td>1.88</td>
<td>0.93%</td>
<td>$0.14</td>
<td>$0.39</td>
<td>-5.11%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Lattice Semiconductor Corp</td>
<td>134.14</td>
<td>9.64</td>
<td>14.03</td>
<td>0.71%</td>
<td>$0.02</td>
<td>$0.08</td>
<td>-14.68%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Average</td>
<td>143.27</td>
<td>5.8</td>
<td>9.12</td>
<td>2.87%</td>
<td>$4.06</td>
<td>$3.93</td>
<td>16.07%</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<style>
 table {
 width: 100%;
 border-collapse: collapse;
 font-family: Arial, sans-serif;
 font-size: 14px;
 }

 th, td {
 padding: 8px;
 text-align: left;
 }

 th {
 background-color: #293a5a;
 color: #fff;
 text-align: left;
 }

 tr:nth-child(even) {
 background-color: #f2f4f8;
 }

 tr:hover {
 background-color: #e1e4ea;
 }

 td:nth-child(3), td:nth-child(5) {
 text-align: left;
 }

 .dividend-amount {
 font-weight: bold;
 color: #0d6efd;
 }

 .dividend-frequency {
 font-size: 12px;
 color: #6c757d;
 }
 </style>Upon closer analysis of NVIDIA, the following trends become apparent: 
<ul>
<li>
At 39.68, the stock's Price to Earnings ratio is 0.28x less than the industry average, suggesting favorable growth potential.
</li>
<li>
With a Price to Book ratio of 35.88, which is 6.19x the industry average, NVIDIA might be considered overvalued in terms of its book value, as it is trading at a higher multiple compared to its industry peers.
</li>
<li>
The Price to Sales ratio of 22.17, which is 2.43x the industry average, suggests the stock could potentially be overvalued in relation to its sales performance compared to its peers.
</li>
<li>
With a Return on Equity (ROE) of 30.42% that is 27.55% above the industry average, it appears that the company exhibits efficient use of equity to generate profits.
</li>
<li>
Compared to its industry, the company has higher Earnings Before Interest, Taxes, Depreciation, and Amortization (EBITDA) of $25.82 Billion, which is 6.36x above the industry average, indicating stronger profitability and robust cash flow generation.
</li>
<li>
With higher gross profit of $28.72 Billion, which indicates 7.31x above the industry average, the company demonstrates stronger profitability and higher earnings from its core operations.
</li>
<li>
The company's revenue growth of 77.94% exceeds the industry average of 16.07%, indicating strong sales performance and market outperformance.
</li>
</ul>
<h3>Debt To Equity Ratio</h3>
<img src="https://www.benzinga.com/files/images/story/2025/1747062020_0.png" alt="debt to equity" />
The debt-to-equity (D/E) ratio is a financial metric that helps determine the level of financial risk associated with a company's capital structure.
Considering the debt-to-equity ratio in industry comparisons allows for a concise evaluation of a company's financial health and risk profile, aiding in informed decision-making.
In terms of the Debt-to-Equity ratio, NVIDIA stands in comparison with its top 4 peers, leading to the following comparisons:
<ul>
<li>
Among its top 4 peers, NVIDIA has a stronger financial position with a lower debt-to-equity ratio of 0.13.
</li>
<li>
This indicates that the company relies less on debt financing and maintains a more favorable balance between debt and equity, which can be viewed positively by investors.
</li>
</ul>
<h3>Key Takeaways</h3>
For NVIDIA, the PE ratio is low compared to peers, indicating potential undervaluation. The high PB and PS ratios suggest strong market sentiment and revenue multiples. In terms of ROE, EBITDA, gross profit, and revenue growth, NVIDIA outperforms its industry peers, reflecting strong financial health and growth prospects.
This article was generated by Benzinga's automated content engine and reviewed by an editor.

NVDA

Comparative Study: NVIDIA And Industry Competitors In Semiconductors &amp; Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Antalpha Platform Holding Company (NASDAQ:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/ANTA#NASDAQ">ANTA</a>) IPO will take place May, 13 on the NASDAQ exchange under the ticker ANTA.
The company is offering shares at an expected price between $11.00 and $13.00 per share with an insider lock-up period of 180 days ending on November 09, 2025.
See also: <a href="https://www.benzinga.com/calendars/ipos">Benzinga IPO Calendar</a>
<h3>About Antalpha Platform Holding Company</h3>
Antalpha provides financing, technology and risk management solutions to the digital asset industry. As the primary lending partner for Bitmain, we are a provider of supply chain financing solutions to institutional and corporate participants in the Bitcoin mining industry, offering loans secured by Bitcoin and Bitcoin mining machines
See also: <a href="https://www.benzinga.com/short-interest">Benzinga's Most Shorted Stocks</a>
This article was generated by Benzinga's automated content engine and reviewed by an editor.

IPOs

ANTA

Antalpha Platform Holding Company IPOs Tomorrow, Here's What You Need To Know

May 9, 2025 records indicate that Representative Jared Moskowitz filed a purchase of AbbVie (NYSE:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/ABBV#NYSE">ABBV</a>), valued between $27,027 and $405,000. According to the May filing, the transaction occurred on May 9, 2025.
Currently, AbbVie shares are trading up 2.18% at $188.62.
<h3>What Representative Has Been Trading Recently</h3>
Over the previous three years, Jared Moskowitz conducted 310 trades, totaling more than $633 thousand. The largest of these were in Raymond James Finl and Seacoast Banking stock. Some of the most notable transactions the Rep. has executed recently include: 
<ul>
<li>Broadcom (NASDAQ:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/AVGO#NASDAQ">AVGO</a>): $15,001 - $50,000 Sale</li>
<li>NVIDIA (NASDAQ:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/NVDA#NASDAQ">NVDA</a>): $1,001 - $15,000 Purchase</li>
<li>Broadcom (NASDAQ:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/AVGO#NASDAQ">AVGO</a>): $1,001 - $15,000 Sale</li>
</ul>
Here's a summary of Jared Moskowitz's most recent trades:
<table>
<thead>
<tr>
<th>Company</th>
<th>Ticker</th>
<th>Stock Type</th>
<th>Amount</th>
<th>Transaction Type</th>
<th>Transaction Date</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>Broadcom</td>
<td>AVGO</td>
<td>STOCK</td>
<td>$15,001 - $50,000</td>
<td>S</td>
<td>2025-03-11</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>NVIDIA</td>
<td>NVDA</td>
<td>STOCK</td>
<td>$1,001 - $15,000</td>
<td>P</td>
<td>2025-03-11</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Broadcom</td>
<td>AVGO</td>
<td>STOCK</td>
<td>$1,001 - $15,000</td>
<td>S</td>
<td>2025-03-10</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Broadcom</td>
<td>AVGO</td>
<td>STOCK</td>
<td>$1,001 - $15,000</td>
<td>S</td>
<td>2025-03-10</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Elevance Health</td>
<td>ELV</td>
<td>STOCK</td>
<td>$1,001 - $15,000</td>
<td>S</td>
<td>2025-03-10</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
Stay informed on Jared Moskowitz's trades and other members of Congress with our real-time <a href="https://www.benzinga.com/gov-trades/members/jared-moskowitz">government trades tracking tool</a>!
<h3>Why Congressional Transactions Matter</h3>
A congressional transaction is when any representative or senator either buys or sells an individual stock.
Anyone working in Congress must file a Periodic Transaction Report to inform the public of their recent transaction within 30 days of being notified of the transaction and within 45 days of the transaction date.
In April 2012, Former President Barack Obama signed the STOCK Act into law. The act prohibits members of Congress from using private information given to them by their position for personal gain such as buying or selling a stock. The act also expanded disclosure requirements for members of Congress by requiring them to file a monthly disclosure.
<h3>The Importance of Congressional Transactions</h3>
Congressional transactions shouldn't be the primary reason for an investing decision, but they can be an important factor for an investor to consider.
When a senator or representative makes a new purchase, it could be an indication they expect the stock to rise.
A sale, on the other hand, can be made for a variety of reasons, and may not necessarily mean the seller thinks the stock will go down.
This article was generated by Benzinga's automated content engine and reviewed by an editor.

Government

Politics

General

ABBV

AVGO

Congressional Trading Report: Rep. Jared Moskowitz Bought Over $27K In AbbVie Stock

Scotiabank analyst Ben Isaacson maintains Canfor Pulp Products (TSX:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/CFX#TSX">CFX</a>) with a Sector Perform and lowers the price target from C$1.25 to C$1.

TSX:CFX

Scotiabank Maintains Sector Perform on Canfor Pulp Products, Lowers Price Target to C$1

Morgan Stanley analyst Angel Castillo maintains WillScot Holdings (NASDAQ:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/WSC#NASDAQ">WSC</a>) with a Overweight and raises the price target from $38 to $39.

Morgan Stanley Maintains Overweight on WillScot Holdings, Raises Price Target to $39

Scotiabank analyst Ben Isaacson maintains Canfor (TSX:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/CFP#TSX">CFP</a>) with a Sector Underperform and lowers the price target from C$15 to C$14.

TSX:CFP

Scotiabank Maintains Sector Underperform on Canfor, Lowers Price Target to C$14

Crypto Twitter lights up every week with new token promotions but most spark and fizzle out. That all changed in December when DeFi challenger Hyperliquid pulled off an extraordinary airdrop coup.
To launch the HYPE token for its proprietary DEX, the project took a unique route to market, holding back the lion's share for early users and avoiding set-asides for VCs, centralized exchanges, or market makers.
A cult-like following, pent-up VC demand, and analyst enthusiasm culminated in the most successful airdrop in history. Valued at close to $7.5 billion at the start of this year, HYPE&#8217;s launch was so lucrative that crypto watchers now wonder if the project's airdrop approach can ever be repeated.
<h1 class="wp-block-heading">Hyperliquid&#8217;s hybrid model</h1>
Hyperliquid is a layer one (L1) blockchain designed by Hyper Foundation to host decentralized finance (DeFi) applications. It uses delegated Proof of Stake secured by its own HyperBFT consensus mechanism.
The project claims its network can handle throughput of 100,000 orders per second, recording every trade, order, liquidation, and cancellation with a block latency measured in milliseconds.
A <a href="https://www.vaneck.com/us/en/blogs/digital-assets/matthew-sigel-vaneck-crypto-monthly-recap-for-december-2024/#notable-performers">note to investors</a> from Mutual Fund manager VanEck calls Hyperliquid a "hybrid blockchain" with aspects of both layer 1 and layer three networks.
<figure class="wp-block-image size-large"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="1024" height="683" src="https://contributor-assets.benzinga.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/05/11074056/HYPE_1Y_graph_coinmarketcap-1024x683.jpeg" alt="" class="wp-image-12748" srcset="https://contributor-assets.benzinga.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/05/11074056/HYPE_1Y_graph_coinmarketcap-1024x683.jpeg 1024w,https://contributor-assets.benzinga.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/05/11074056/HYPE_1Y_graph_coinmarketcap-300x200.jpeg 300w,https://contributor-assets.benzinga.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/05/11074056/HYPE_1Y_graph_coinmarketcap-768x512.jpeg 768w,https://contributor-assets.benzinga.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/05/11074056/HYPE_1Y_graph_coinmarketcap.jpeg 1200w" sizes="(max-width: 1024px) 100vw, 1024px" /></figure>
HYPE's price trajectory since December 2024 &#x7C; Source: CoinMarketCap
Operating its own set of validators places Hyperliquid firmly in the L1 category. By Van Eck&#8217;s analysts noted that the network&#8217;s trading capital is denominated in USDC, which is bridged from Arbitrum, an Ethereum layer-2 chain. That combination of elements pushes Hyperliquid into L3 territory — dependent on both Arbitrum and Ethereum for the state of its USDC tokens.
Hyperliquid chose that unconventional framework because it allows the blockchain to process many more transactions-per-second while also giving Ethereum users a stable bridge.
"The L1 architecture gives Hyperliquid a scaling advantage over competitors while the L3 framework gives Hyperliquid access to Ethereum's massive base of users and assets," Van Eek added.
<h1 class="wp-block-heading">Future proofed</h1>
Hyperliquid's L1 was optimized for Hyperliquid DEX, the project's flagship application. A fully on-chain order book perpetual futures exchange, it promises low fees, transparent on-chain trades, up to 50x leverage, and one-click trading.
Although Hyperliquid had announced in April 2023 that the project has no plans to "support general-purpose smart contracts" on the Hyperliquid L1, a general-purpose Ethereum virtual machine (EVM) called HyperEVM is now in development.
HyperEVM isn&#8217;t a separate chain as it&#8217;s secured by the L1&#8217;s HyperBFT consensus mechanism. <a href="https://hyperliquid.gitbook.io/hyperliquid-docs/hyperliquid-l1/hyperevm">According to the project</a>, this will allow it to interact directly with network native components.
<figure class="wp-block-image size-large"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="1024" height="1013" src="https://contributor-assets.benzinga.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/05/11084935/Hyperliquid_stack_Credit_Hyper_Foundation-1024x1013.webp" alt="" class="wp-image-12756" srcset="https://contributor-assets.benzinga.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/05/11084935/Hyperliquid_stack_Credit_Hyper_Foundation-1024x1013.webp 1024w,https://contributor-assets.benzinga.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/05/11084935/Hyperliquid_stack_Credit_Hyper_Foundation-300x297.webp 300w,https://contributor-assets.benzinga.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/05/11084935/Hyperliquid_stack_Credit_Hyper_Foundation-768x760.webp 768w,https://contributor-assets.benzinga.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/05/11084935/Hyperliquid_stack_Credit_Hyper_Foundation-1536x1519.webp 1536w,https://contributor-assets.benzinga.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/05/11084935/Hyperliquid_stack_Credit_Hyper_Foundation.webp 2000w" sizes="(max-width: 1024px) 100vw, 1024px" /></figure>
The Hyperliquid Stack &#x7C; Credit: Hyper Foundation
<h1 class="wp-block-heading">Assembling a top team</h1>
Hyper Foundation is led by CEO <a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WeRh589I76o">Jeff Basedzos</a> and a group of tech heavyweights from Harvard, CalTech, and MIT who&#8217;ve previously worked at Airtable, Citadel, Hudson River Trading, and Nuro.
The team initially worked on proprietary market-making in crypto in 2020, later expanding to develop DeFi solutions in 2022. According to project&#8217;s website, Hyper Foundation is fully bootstrapped with no outside capital.
<h1 class="wp-block-heading">HYPE's Tokenomics</h1>
HYPE, the native token of Hyperliquid L1, is designed for staking and gas fee payment on <a href="https://x.com/HyperFND/status/1891730068151599464">HyperEVM</a>. Prior to the airdrop, <a href="https://hyperfnd.medium.com/hype-genesis-1830a4dc2e3f">Hyperliquid said</a> tokens allocated to core contributors will be locked for one year after genesis, and that most token vesting schedules would be completed between 2027 and 2028. No tokens were allocated to private investors, centralized exchanges, or market makers.
<h1 class="wp-block-heading">The golden airdrop</h1>
In a year marked by crypto community frustration over sky-high valuations of venture capital-backed tokens, Hyperliquid's novel token drop reinvigorated a bloated crypto airdrop market. Today its at the crest of a month-long uptrend that&#8217;s <a href="https://coinmarketcap.com/currencies/hyperliquid/">added 75% in value</a>.
The project won kudos and inflows for its community-first approach, though it&#8217;s worth noting that HYPE still hasn&#8217;t been listed on either Coinbase or Kraken. HYPE&#8217;s <a href="https://coinmarketcap.com/currencies/hyperliquid/">steady rise</a> since early April suggests the blockchain&#8217;s promise of hyperspeed and utility are starting to come true, however. At time of writing it <a href="https://rankfi.com/perpetual-dexs/">held the top spot</a> on RankFi&#8217;s perpetual futures DEX league table.

Coverage of Bitcoin, Etherum, Ripple and all the latest digital currencies.

Date	Put/Call	Strike Price	Exp Date	DTE	Trade Vol	Day Vol	Vol / OI	OI	Trade Type	Sentiment
09:31 AMFeb 18, 2025	CALL	$175.00	Jan 15, 2027	612	0	501	0	514	SWEEP	BULLISH
10:27 AMFeb 13, 2025	PUT	$165.00	Mar 21, 2025	-53	1004	1000	331	303	TRADE	BULLISH

Comments

Cloudflare

Unusual Options Activity for

뉴스

파트너 / 기고자

벤징가 글로벌